Nope. They've always been big.They look very recently done, v shiny.![]()
Nope. They've always been big.They look very recently done, v shiny.![]()
Absolutely true.Very few of the actors cast in the role could be described to physically resemble Fleming's Bond could they? Indeed very few recent Bond films resemble Fleming's Bond in any way.
I’ve tried every contraceptive going over the years. Not one made mine any bigger. Like I needed or want bigger ones.I also want to know! But I think they said recently there is a breast cancer risk, which put me off.
Makes you hold a shit load of water weight.My boobs shrank when I stopped taking the pill so there could be something in it.
I think Michael Braun’s Love Me Do is meant to capture them in the earliest years quite well. Look at the tagline quote from Lennon himselfThey’re all pretty sycophantic! I honestly can’t remember the one that was more scathing. I read it about 20 years ago.
I have been pondering that for some time - could sadly it seems apply to many others.I Was wondering awhile ago,Mark William Thompson (who opened up the pot on Saville) said awhile ago,A Well known Celebrity will be exposed,Lots of peeps thought OFAH actor,I’m wondering whether now it could be Philth.
I’m probably wrong but so much info coming out now and the Philth fred.![]()
I'm currently reading it online from my local library so you don't have to pay if you don't want to.Hmmmm considering buying the Denise van outen book now (a sentence I never thought I’d say).
THANK YOU! I was just reading this and thought maybe him because he's announced he's going to be a dad and is extremely privileged but wasn't 100% sureI have to ask, who is Slender/Pencil Dick?!
She's being upstaged by sunglasses dude's forehead here.Vardy is doing a documentary on JVs.
Changing the subject- photos starting to come in from BAFTAs tonight. Here is Billie Piper. She looks terrible. View attachment 2169673
Yeah, that was what I meant! It’s just that they were painted as the nice boys your mum could approve of, instead of the Stones and their wild reputation.They were just as badly behaved as The Stones, it was just covered up and they were seen as the more clean cut of the two. The Stones revealed in their reputation as the bad boy alternative. They were all so scarily young when you look at it now. All in their early 20’s when they became globally famous. Mad really.
I raise you the late '80s Yuppie series Capital City. Agree, he's a great presence on our screens.I absolutely adore Jason Issacs since seeing him in the 1992 series Civvies
Oh yeah, there's definitely something about Becky!I think we need to tall about Becky Mantinns hair on ITV news tonight
Ricardo!The Brazilian guy from the Salon (can't remember his name) cut my hair once
Yeah Peter FosterWas it a Peter something…
Supposedly, but no one has ever confirmed it.Didn't Lennon put a brick through McCartney's window once?
So many of them look awful IMO. Some of those young women who are 25/26/27 look a lot older. Emma Mackey looks terrible. Is this what happens when they do their own make up?
I'm talking about after the Beatles. Many critics had been pointing out that Lennon's solo output was rubbish.Eh? He may not have been the most technically accomplished musician but he wasn't a joke of a musician. I do think you're somewhat rewriting history here. There's never been a bigger band than The Beatles - it still blows my mind how prolific they were with even their B sides being brilliant compositions. They could have churned out variations on She Loves You for eternity but instead didn't take the easy predictable route and creatively developed in major leaps from Rubber Soul onwards.