You said you know drugs dealers who got more than 8 as if drug dealers shouldn’t get more? I don’t actually see the difference between FS and drug dealers who are part of a trail of misery and ruin lives myself but there you go.I didn’t say drug dealers should get less did I? If I did feel free to quote me. I do believe people who fail to protect their children should get more. Regardless of IQ levels.
Ok I think I am understanding what you are saying. So for those the majority who would protect their kids even in a DV relationship etc, they get all the help they can and do everything to protect their child and as such will never be arrested, taken to trial or given a prison sentence.Sorry I meant the rule as in 'the way it will always happen' - i.e. 'exception to the rule'.
They're not conflicting at all, you're just failing to understand. Regardless - the trial is over. It was discussed in length and daily for weeks on end. I'm not really in the market to rehash it all.So do you think FS protected her child or not? As you made two very conflicting statements which I have quoted. Surely it is one or the other?
Again that is what you assumed. I did not say anywhere they should get any less. However I believe a woman (I use that term lightly when it comes to FS) who failed to protect her child and ultimately ended up in a death should get a lot more.You said you know drugs dealers who got more than 8 as if drug dealers shouldn’t get more? I don’t actually see the difference between FS and drug dealers who are part of a trail of misery and ruin lives myself but there you go.
They are conflicting they’ve literally been quoted. I shall quote again.They're not conflicting at all, you're just failing to understand. Regardless - the trial is over. It was discussed in length and daily for weeks on end. I'm not really in the market to rehash it all.
Which of these two statements do you stand by then?. So I am not sure why it's so hard to believe that FS didn't manage to protect Star.She was the victim of a domestically abusive relationship AND she failed to protect Star
You compared the two when you said you know drug dealers who got morecomparing the two is ridiculous.
That is not what I said though, your own brain came up with that.
I honestly think you have trouble reading very simple statements.Again that is what you assumed. I did not say anywhere they should get any less. However I believe a woman (I use that term lightly when it comes to FS) who failed to protect her child and ultimately ended up in a death should get a lot more.
Although drug dealers destroy lives, drug takers have usually made that choice themselves wether or not to take them. Star had no say at all, comparing the two is ridiculous.
That is not what I said though, your own brain came up with that.
They are conflicting they’ve literally been quoted. I shall quote again.
Which of these two statements do you stand by then?
Yes I compared them in a different way. A beast who allows the death of her own child IMO (which I am free to give here) should get alot more than a drug dealer. Not once however did I say a drug dealer deserves less.You compared the two when you said you know drug dealers who got more
Don’t talk to me about trouble reading when you make conflicting statements that make no sense which you avoid elaborating on. Perhaps you have trouble writing?I honestly think you have trouble reading very simple statements.
You stated that 'plenty of people in domestically abusive relationships manage to protect their children'. However, FS did not. I said I wasn't sure why you found that so hard to believe, just because 'plenty' of other people can and have (not sure who the plenty are right enough, but that's another argument).
So, just because *plenty* of women have managed to protect their children, has no bearing on whether FS would or not, in her unique situation.
OK you didn’t say less but maybe you’re best off writing to the sentencing council explaining your reasoning behind why you think the sentencing for that particular offence should be heavier than it is for drug dealersYes I compared them in a different way. A beast who allows the death of her own child IMO (which I am free to give here) should get alot more than a drug dealer. Not once however did I say a drug dealer deserves less.
Wow, really this is a question?OK you didn’t say less but maybe you’re best off writing to the sentencing council explaining your reasoning behind why you think the sentencing for that particular offence should be heavier than it is for drug dealers
And by the way, it’s not only drug takers who’s lives are ruined by drug supply.
I didn’t put a ? So I guess it wasn’t a question. Read it again, I said not only drug takers whose lives are ruined by drug supply. Drug supply in the process of acquiring said drugs runs alongside violent crime, child exploitation, modern slavery, human trafficking….Wow, really this is a question?
A toddler who isn’t even old enough to consent to anything at all dying? And drug takers who have made a choice to buy said drugs from a drug dealer and therefor have had their lives ruined?
Really? C’mon.
And rightly so! May she get double the sentence!I personally think she was given the correct sentence, you think 8 years was too lenient, fair enough so do others and now it’s back in the hands of the court to decide if it will be increased.
Well she can only get another 6 years as the maximum is 14.And rightly so! May she get double the sentence!
Let’s not get pedantic, hopefully she gets another 6 years then.Well she can only get another 6 years as the maximum is 14.
There was an article from a former inmate of SB’s who was apparently in prison with her, it’s been posted a few pages back. Apparently she’s having a tough time in prison.Just to change the topic up a bit, does anyone know any further news on SB or FS? I am intrigued to know more about them since they went to prison. I think it was all the time we all invested in the case even if we do disagree on certain points I think we spent so much time reading the transcripts and then awaiting sentencing and then all of a sudden it was over. Maybe its an unhealthy to want to know more information but it does intrigue me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?