Ibrokethegoddamnwheel
Chatty Member
There’s a lot they’re failing to mention. My OH hasn’t read up on the case at all and when he read about it in the news earlier, he was asking me why they both weren’t done for murder and got quite angry about it (similar to the fb groups but not as extreme). I had to explain a fair bit to him including the whole iq/compliance thing, the age gap between FS and SB, the manipulation and abuse FS suffered etc. Not to make him feel sympathetic towards FS, but to get him to see it really wasn’t as cut and dry as the press are making it out to be. That whilst FS was a terrible mother and acted awfully to Star at times, not being found guilty of murder was the correct decision and that C&A was a more fitting verdict.Does anybody think the national media are failing to mention FS IQ? It’s relevant to the case but not been reported by any of the media outlets I’ve seen so far.
The majority of journalism in this country is shockingly bad, it thrives on sensationalism and lacks nuance. I guess that’s what gets the most clicks.
Last edited: