AmberSpyglass
VIP Member
I can’t imagine @hongkongfuey what awful terrors you’ve been through , life is shit and nothing I say makes it less awful . Take my and I mean it with love .
I know. A little self-deprecating concession on this topic would alter my perception of her (a little bit). It's human and real. I get her point that she has no obligation to tell everyone what she has had done, and that's true generally speaking, BUT when you make your own career about aspirational skincare and makeup AND you are flogging the stuff, you need to be more transparent. She was asked a direct question, and she obfuscated. Wasn't there a time when she mocked celebs for answering "Pond's cream" when asked about their perfect complexions? How is answering "concealer" any different?It is the fact she is essentially a hypocrite, it may be that she is a deluded hypocrite by not realising the gap between what she says and her actions. The video above where were was interviewed and she states ‘I’m not so bothered by wrinkles.’ And yet she has a forehead that doesn’t really move from Botox from her Mayfair clinic. In my mind that is hypocritical and l would love to understand why she thinks it isn’t or maybe she doesn’t even analyse it that deeply.
If she wasn’t getting Botox and had lines between her brows/ on forehead would she be ‘not so bothered about wrinkles‘?
If she just said - l get Botox as l prefer not to have lines around this section of my face but around my eyes l am not so bothered - then l could understand that. We are not stupid people - despite the fact in her mind we are all ‘Trolls’ for simply noticing this discrepancy.
Maybe for her as long as what she does state is arguably true and what she omits or edits from what she says therefore doesn’t count. E.g Right now I am not so bothered by wrinkles is true but omitted from that is ‘now that l have all my forehead related wrinkles taken care of by Botox’
Total hypocrisy. She makes these arbitrary distinctions as though they nullify negate anything she personally chooses to do. She takes such a hard stance against a thing when she does exactly the same TYPE of thing herself. It's really splitting hairs to separate them, isn't it? I do think she's not all that self-awareYes she said it was to correct a "wonky top lip"
Here's what she wrote about contouring before:
For someone who adores makeup, I find the current craze for contouring a bit saddening. It appears that not only were our arses too fat and our mons pubis too hairy, but now our heads are the wrong shape, too, and need faceting like an emerald before we can so much as nip to the Co-op.
I am not a fan of the rhymes either, in poetry or elsewhere. It's too Dr SeussThere are some great thread title suggestions here but can I put in a plea for it not to be a rhyming one, please? They do my head in, sorry, boil my piss, give me a nervo, etc .
Although obviously this one is great .
Anyone remember when SH used to go on about how wasteful using cotton wool was, like some holier than thou eco warrior? Look at her now, digging herself out of a pile of Drunk Elephant plastic pots and fucking spatulas!I assume Dennis Gross must know where the bodies are buried or something, because every influencer hypes those (wasteful) exfoliating pads, and they give me awful cystic spots. My skin isn’t sensitive or anything. Same with the Zelens pads.
I’m so negative, sorry .
That is beyond disingenuous. Really craven. Hiding behind ‘It’s a film quote’. Yes, and...? It’s still deifying a pweirdo."Just a surname" as it fits her current agenda..
I dunno if I'm being super picky but RBGs surname is spelt differently. So having to change the meaning of a candle as they are a weirdo to honour someone else whose name is spelt differently kinda shows the candle should not be a thing..
just had a good read of the comments on that Graun post. Saddest part was Alkistis fighting Sali’s corner so valiantly and naively when Sali detested her, or more particularly her knowledge about products and ingredients. I really hope Alkistis is someone on here who has woken up to the lies and lack of integrity oozing from Sali’s airbrushed, ringlighted pores.Not so much recently but she did in early columns claim that both groomed brows and false eyelashes are as rejuvenating as Botox and that the key to a youthful appearance is white teeth.
Now she claims not to be concerned about ageing and wrinkles and to want glow from her skincare, neglevtong to mention she's got the anti ageing bit covered by regular Botox. In the Vogue piece about her wedding she mentioned getting her usual hair extensions but not anything about any injectibles (though gave a shout out to her Botox practitioner). There was another article she did recently of her beauty address book where under the heading of anti-ageing she went on about Vitamin C - no mention of any other help in that department.
Much longer ago there was the debacle of the photo shopped image to accompany a column which apparently had been submitted and published by mistake but which SH happily shared on Instagram the day the column was published - no mention that a misleading photo had been used.
This is the column - there are loads of comments about it.
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion...ali-hughes?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Samsung_Notes
It’s Vit A for maintaining eye health, but hey only a few letters difference Someone tell SH to eat her carrots.Vitamin D is not an "eye" vitamin. What's she on about?
Katy heyes markup (no me neither..)@Yel - whose video did Sali jack-in-the-box into? She must have some kind of alert set up to monitor this!