Critical thinking is not her strong suit. If it were, she'd be able to get here in perspective
several points? I wish she would clarify even just one. Even her response there has no point. She is pointless.It seems others are equally confusedView attachment 83583
I've read it a couple of times and agree with you that the article doesn't really explain anywhere how experts are better than home treatments. Yes I'm sure they are nice for a 'pampering' spendy treat but how? Why? And does the exhorbitant pricetag justify it?several points? I wish she would clarify even just one. Even her response there has no point. She is pointless.
Perhaps she had a backlog of #presstreatments that needed taking care of?She's been going on about these sort of facials for years. Not sure why it's suddenly article worthy.
Oh before they have to be declared legally as #AD?Perhaps she had a backlog of #presstreatments that needed taking care of?
Ooh she'll think you're after her job with writing like thatDoes the whole article boil down to the point ‘make sure they include extractions within the facial’
Yes, with the possible addition of ‘and be firm’.Does the whole article boil down to the point ‘make sure they include extractions within the facial’
Spot on observation. Jeez, how does this get past an editor?Sali talks about a pointless word... by using pointless words
The word itself – meaningless, infantile, a bit 80s and decidedly naff – is emetic enough without the inefficiency, the pointlessness, the utterly wasted time and opportunity of a procedure that fixes precisely nothing.
Next thread contender, if the word emetic could be includedSali’s column “meaningless, infantile, a bit 80s and decidedly naff”
I know. It's hilariousSali talks about a pointless word... by using pointless words
The word itself – meaningless, infantile, a bit 80s and decidedly naff – is emetic enough without the inefficiency, the pointlessness, the utterly wasted time and opportunity of a procedure that fixes precisely nothing.