'And if I don't mention them they might stop'.“Among my favourites because they give me freebies and have done for years”, she means.
Oh my effing god , this comment is spot on. I am so sick of so called journalists being stuck in their bubble.'Among my favourites (in the south-east, because that’s where I live)'
Do some sodding research then! Travel a bit - who is this helping?! As I previously stated she's been going on about these places for years. Tour some northern niche salons.
Yes, she used emetic on Twitter the other day too- it’s the new nervo!Next thread contender, if the word emetic could be included
I believe this is called a word saladSali talks about a pointless word... by using pointless words
The word itself – meaningless, infantile, a bit 80s and decidedly naff – is emetic enough without the inefficiency, the pointlessness, the utterly wasted time and opportunity of a procedure that fixes precisely nothing.
Hannah Pool pretty much said this in a column from 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/05/fashion.hannahpoolonbeautyDoes the whole article boil down to the point ‘make sure they include extractions within the facial’
That's a much better article - informative and to the point.Hannah Pool pretty much said this in a column from 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/05/fashion.hannahpoolonbeauty
Oh duck OOOOOFFFFF!...not you sineadf!"Vaishaly Patel literally hoovers crap from the depths of your pores"
Literally?
Right well that answered my question as to why salon treatments are sometimes better than home ones. Something SH failed to do. Her article was so bloody faffy it was hard to tease any useful facts from it.Hannah Pool pretty much said this in a column from 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/05/fashion.hannahpoolonbeauty
No she doesn't. Can you imagine being sat in a chair and the facialist approaching, Dyson in hand? You'd be off like a rat up a drainpipe!"Vaishaly Patel literally hoovers crap from the depths of your pores"
Completely agree. Pores are only ever mentioned in relation to dirt and problems. The beauty industrynever gives an explanation of sebaceous filaments vs blackheads either. I spent years thinking I had terrible blackheads, ruining my skin with abrasive products and tools until the dermatologist I had to see to sort the mess out told me these were sebaceous filaments, everyone had them and unless you're a child, you will have these tiny dark shadows, but they aren't blackheads.The pore obsession really riles me. It's just the same as the cellulite bollocks. Yes we have pores. Yes some folks pore can be "worse" than others and maybe there are some treatments that make a bit of a temporary difference. But holy tit the industry has run wild with it telling everyone to rip out their sebaceous filaments or be damned....lunacy
actually this explains her pummeling the crap out of her face while applying her makeup. Can’t recall which video it was but it made me wince.Sooo...for a home diy pummeling, I assume you fling the best part of a week's wages down a drain and then punch yourself in the face?
Would you mind sharing a bit more about Skin Laundry? I'm intrigued but a little scared too.This article is also missing any recent developments in facials - the hydrafacial is amazing, and so many places are now doing facials involving lasers, LED therapy, microneedling, etc. It’s not expensive (I go to Skin Laundry which is £50 a pop), and can make a real difference for some skin complaints.
It was the Bobbi Brown colour-matching one. Disturbing viewingactually this explains her pummeling the crap out of her face while applying her makeup. Can’t recall which video it was but it made me wince.