i don't think they're with gleam any moredoes anyone know what's happening with their videos? I don't avidly follow the sjs or this thread but have lurked a bit through all this drama. I was under the impression j had decided to delete all the videos but now a lot of them seem to be back up. bit confused about what his logic is behind what he's left deleted/reposted. He seems to have got rid of almost everything pre-emilia, put a couple of her baby videos back up and then there's a couple of years gap til the next videos he's uploaded. Just seems like a bit of a random decision with what he's decided to keep and get rid off. Wonder if they've got people at gleam progressively searching through them for anything that can be viewed as controversial.
Also definitely wouldn't say that girls need to wear shorts under their dresses, I never did as a child and probably wouldn't do the same for my own children - however saying that I also wouldn't upload a picture of it for millions to see.
SacconeJolys #73 I never knew ADHD stood for A Dick Head Dad
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Sacconejolys Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
i don't think they're with gleam any more
He needs t
Pretty sure they havent been with gleem for a while
They’re not. He must be sifting through them himself and since he has no sense of what is acceptable and what is problematic, he’s probably doing a tit with the task. I can just imagine him scratching his head trying to figure it out and bringing in Anal to ask her “like, they’re in the bat’, but we can’t see their bits or anything like, can I leave that one up ?”. Anna be like “Jonathiiiiin, we said no bats and no cold showers”.
Watched Stacey sleeps over today
She really did not like that little man
She really did not like that little man
We used to tuck our skirts into our knickers and get on with doing cartwheels. Never once felt any embarrassment about knickers.
SacconeJolys #74 albowing himself to the front of the SS list
What are you basing this assumption on? There have always been paedos. The Catholic Church was rampant with them.
It's just not as hidden as it used to be.
SacconeJolys #74: tit tattoos, Jonathan's worried about school fees, better recycle old videos
Lol!! No bat on the broken batroom!
Speaking of animals that fly.... has the chimney been sorted out yet, or is it still filled with dead birds? Did they simply forget what's behind the board he put up in front of the fireplace?
More than likely. They would have documented that. Anything for content hey !
That's what I thought. They can't pass up content like that... not shown = didn't happen.
Personally don’t give a tit whether you put shorts on your kids or not - the topics raised in these threads aren’t meant to be taken personally. The point is Jonathan knows what he’s doing taking pictures of E2 in a dress flashing underwear to the camera. It’s the exact same as if he did it to Emilia, Alessia or Andrea, you shouldn’t ever post photos of your kids underwear online for thousands of strangers to do with it as they please.
Is this his confession that the non binary is a load of tit as we all thought?? Surely you can’t be non binary and refer to yourself as the bag “man”??
"Hold this iPad and coats, JONATHAN, I've spotted Matt and I'm going to go drape myself across him and climb him like a tree."
As a mother of daughters I'd just like to add that shaming really small children into thinking the tops of their legs and knickers shouldn't be flashed quickly as they play is just silly. I don't put shorts under dresses in summer because that's just starting girls so young to be told you should be hot and uncomfortable to please men. Gross. BUT no I would never take a picture of their underwear or post it online for the world to see because the boundary has been firmly crossed there. So wrong. Girl or boy, no underwear shots should be online. i even object to Anna showing the stack of cltohes for the next day with underwear on top, and the kids aren't even in them then! The world should not know what your kids knickers look like
You should have your child in knickerbockers and petticoats to hide even their ankles, for 'tis what was done in ye olden times, lest a man saw a flash of raunchy leg!
Fully embracing his feminine side, I see....
Has he already forgotten he felt oppressed by having to wear "men's clothes"
Nice colourful outfit you've got there, Jonno.......Fully embracing his feminine side, I see....
Has he already forgotten he felt oppressed by having to wear "men's clothes"
- Status