Sure, but if we go with their narrative of being oh so clued up about trans people and their struggles they should be aware of this and not use 'Eduardo' anymore. Unless they too know it's not real ...Deadname? This is an 8 year old child. There’s something very distasteful and perverse about adults applying that sort of rationale towards a child. Too much.
It would be correct to term it as the child (or person's) dead name if they themselves had decided to come out as non-binary or trans, they themselves had decided to socially transition, and they themselves has chosen their new name. None of that is the case for the child in question - all evidence (and there is a lot of it online) points to Eduardo being a kid who likes pink, sparkly things, dressing up, and playing with toys that might be considered to be 'girls' ones. His family reinforces that all of that makes you a girl - it means you can't be a boy. It's also very much about him pleasing his father, and the supposed transgender journey being used to generate the family's income. It's not about a child becoming who they really know that they are deep down inside.His name isn't "dead" it's his birth name
He’s disgusting. He’s definitely sharing that photo for his “friends”. I have no words.Why even post it to the internet?! Sure, it’s memories, snap the photo, look back on it in a few years, bring it out for 21st birthdays but keep it private from the ‘millions’ of followers (millions in quotes … a lot are bought!)
Exactly.I think the big issue with “deadnaming” etc is regardless as to whether we think it’s all made up, all true or a bit of both, Jonathan claims to be so clued up on all things LGBTQ+, thereby he should be fully aware of how frowned upon it is to refer to a person “pre transition”. He’s very quick to accuse others of not being educated but frequently shows that he himself hasn’t got a clue what he’s talking about. It’s just embarrassing. He constantly contradicts everything he says.
Exactly. Whenever our 4 year old wears dresses she has either cycling shorts or tights on underneathView attachment 1249914
This is why I put my daughter in leggings or shorts for softplay etc so she can just be a kid and play without having to worry about being exposed
Couldn't agree more. I've also heard from parents who've children have actually died that "deadname" is very traumatising for them. It's far too extreme a term for a name change.Deadname? This is an 8 year old child. There’s something very distasteful and perverse about adults applying that sort of rationale towards a child. Too much.
I find the term terrible, too. I sure do hope they not use it around E2.Couldn't agree more. I've also heard from parents who've children have actually died that "deadname" is very traumatising for them. It's far too extreme a term for a name change.
See I find the wearing of cycling shorts under a dress for a small child.... odd... why?! What are they covering that the knickers don't?!Exactly. Whenever our 4 year old wears dresses she has either cycling shorts or tights on underneath
Because time had changed, there’s more and more pedalos than ever. You as parents are responsible for your children. Even in the very past woman wore long underwear under dresses.See I find the wearing of cycling shorts under a dress for a small child.... odd... why?! What are they covering that the knickers don't?!
It's not something i've ever done with my girls - 6 and 2. Different of course if one of them asked to wear shorts under their dress at school or whatever. I wouldn't say no, but I'm not doing it until then because I don't see the point!
I quite agree. None of my 5 year old friends do this. They all run around in dresses & skirts with knickers on. What do you do with school uniform? All the girls at DDs primary school from age 4 to age 10 are currently in gingham summer dresses, socks & shoes.. they aren’t allowed to wear leggings underneath their summer dresses. They could wear tights I guess but it’s pretty mild now & they’d be hot! Do you make them wear leggings on holidays abroad?! Or if it’s a hot day in summer here?See I find the wearing of cycling shorts under a dress for a small child.... odd... why?! What are they covering that the knickers don't?!
It's not something i've ever done with my girls - 6 and 2. Different of course if one of them asked to wear shorts under their dress at school or whatever. I wouldn't say no, but I'm not doing it until then because I don't see the point!
I think it’s quite common nowadays my 10 year old niece refuses to wear a dress unless she has cycling shorts under it. Even when she’s wearing her school uniform she wears shorts under her skirt. I’m not sure if it’s just her age though cause when she was younger she didn’t. Plus the fact she’s always doing handstands and cartwheels lolSee I find the wearing of cycling shorts under a dress for a small child.... odd... why?! What are they covering that the knickers don't?!
It's not something i've ever done with my girls - 6 and 2. Different of course if one of them asked to wear shorts under their dress at school or whatever. I wouldn't say no, but I'm not doing it until then because I don't see the point!
I work in school, currently in year one and yes girls are allowed shorts under school uniformsI quite agree. None of my 5 year old friends do this. They all run around in dresses & skirts with knickers on. What do you do with school uniform? All the girls at DDs primary school from age 4 to age 10 are currently in gingham summer dresses, socks & shoes.. they aren’t allowed to wear leggings underneath their summer dresses. They could wear tights I guess but it’s pretty mild now & they’d be hot! Do you make them wear leggings on holidays abroad?! Or if it’s a hot day in summer here?
I completely & utterly disagree that I am not protecting my children by letter them wear dresses & knickers in summer.It. Makes me quite cross if I’m honest.
I don't know about you, but when I was little I would have been embarrassed to know people can see my pants. I wouldn't want the boys to see them either. By wearing shorts, girls can run, jump and cartwheel without the embarrassment of showing their underwear. It's not always a sexual thing.See I find the wearing of cycling shorts under a dress for a small child.... odd... why?! What are they covering that the knickers don't?!
It's not something i've ever done with my girls - 6 and 2. Different of course if one of them asked to wear shorts under their dress at school or whatever. I wouldn't say no, but I'm not doing it until then because I don't see the point!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?