Oh sorry can you show me where I said that?? Because I don’t recall that or talking about thumbnails or Emilia being used for anything?? Strange! Someone must have spoken for me whilst I wasn’t here?!!You honestly think he doesn’t know what he’s doing? He picked this thumbnail... HE picked it....it’s not random. She is a 7 year old girl who is being used for views and money.View attachment 171782
You seem to be very defensive....Oh sorry can you show me where I said that?? Because I don’t recall that or talking about thumbnails or Emilia being used for anything?? Strange! Someone must have spoken for me whilst I wasn’t here?!!
I said that the comments were disgusting for sexualising a child, and someone told me that they’re not and the “only person” doing that was Jonathan. Sorry - but I see some comments talking about a 7 year old girl in a disgusting and illegal way, and if you don’t think so.. then you are the same.
Yes, because someone has just put words in my mouth and if someone does not think that those comments on the tik tok are disgusting and that “the only problem is Jonathan”, then they clearly do not see a problem with you children being sexualised by the general public and probably need to be spoken to by a therapist or the police.You seem to be very defensive....
No one is disputing that people who make those comments are disgusting and need to be reported. But if that video and the kids weren’t exploited to begin with then there would be no videos or tiktoks to comment on. It’s a job as parents to protect your kids and Jonathan (and Anna) are not doing that by posting them all over the Internet.Yes, because someone has just put words in my mouth and if someone does not think that those comments on the tik tok are disgusting and that “the only problem is Jonathan”, then they clearly do not see a problem with you children being sexualised by the general public and probably need to be spoken to by a therapist or the police.
i think someone said that anna got him that plate? but does anyone else remember he had a plate that referenced friendliest friends?Cringing at the personalised number plate on that Ferrari... this is vanity at its finest. He says he 'sold' the card and it's now in Ireland but obviously licence plate hasn't been changed yet.
I agree that those comments wouldn’t happen if Jonathan hadn’t put them up in the first place, but there are people on here saying that the comments aren’t an issue?!! (See the quoted post below) And those people need to be reprimanded! Because they’re prt of the problem and if you EVER see children as ANYTHING to do with sex you are a CRIMINAL.No one is disputing that people who make those comments are disgusting and need to be reported. But if that video and the kids weren’t exploited to begin with then there would be no videos or tiktoks to comment on. It’s a job as parents to protect your kids and Jonathan (and Anna) are not doing that by posting them all over the Internet.
It's not the 1st time comments like that have been made , any half decent father would take such pictures down or better still not pimp his child out for perverts to pleasure themselves over!!! The only sexualusing of children is from there perverted father!!!
The comment about it no longer being his car isn't there anymore?i think someone said that anna got him that plate? but does anyone else remember he had a plate that referenced friendliest friends?
The comment about it no longer being his car isn't there anymore?
I don’t understand how people are arguing with me and saying I’m defensive when I literally said that???I think this argument is a misunderstanding. From what I've read and understood no one is saying the comments aren't a problem. They definitely are. But, again from my understanding, what is being said is those comments could not be a problem (as in they wouldn't exist) if the content didn't exist, bringing the blame for those comments into Jonathan. Jonathan who knowingly puts this content out there knowing that comments like this would present themselves.
I agree that those comments wouldn’t happen if Jonathan hadn’t put them up in the first place, but there are people on here saying that the comments aren’t an issue?!! (See the quoted post below) And those people need to be reprimanded! Because they’re prt of the problem and if you EVER see children as ANYTHING to do with sex you are a CRIMINAL.
Exactly this..... why would you serve up your children to perverts to w%%% over?I think this argument is a misunderstanding. From what I've read and understood no one is saying the comments aren't a problem. They definitely are. But, again from my understanding, what is being said is those comments could not be a problem (as in they wouldn't exist) if the content didn't exist, bringing the blame for those comments into Jonathan. Jonathan who knowingly puts this content out there knowing that comments like this would present themselves.
Ohh Duhhh, he has me blocked, so of course I can't see his reply
I bet he’s raging. I’m guessing he wouldn’t have wanted us all to know that the Ferrari is gone.Ohh Duhhh, he has me blocked, so of course I can't see his reply
Agree 100%those who make the sick comments are just as discusting as the ones who put the images up!! Or dont remove immediately!!!I agree that those comments wouldn’t happen if Jonathan hadn’t put them up in the first place, but there are people on here saying that the comments aren’t an issue?!! (See the quoted post below) And those people need to be reprimanded! Because they’re prt of the problem and if you EVER see children as ANYTHING to do with sex you are a CRIMINAL.
Catch 22 situation, it's all wrong end of, the imagies should not be put up or taken down as soon as you become aware what kind if audience it attracting!!!Well have to correct you on that last sentence there - the sexualising is from the perverted members of the public commenting things like that
Love the 'sold'. Nope. Maybe the company he leased it from has sold it, but he hasn't.