Mr.Mistoffelees
Chatty Member
I'm watching the King Lear segment and I'm trying not to pluck my eyelashes out.
Roobie really does have only one formula for reviewing books: X didn't have as many Y as I expected, therefore X bad.
In this case, King Lear didn't have as many Cordelia lines as she expected, therefore King Lear bad.
She also shoehorns a useless point about how Cordelia would be played by a young boy during Shakespeare's time to appear knowledgeable. That's a fact I learned in primary school and I'm from Eastern Europe, it's hardly impressive. She can only relate to a book if one of the main characters is a child, what a tragic waste of an English literature degree.
Roobie really does have only one formula for reviewing books: X didn't have as many Y as I expected, therefore X bad.
In this case, King Lear didn't have as many Cordelia lines as she expected, therefore King Lear bad.
She also shoehorns a useless point about how Cordelia would be played by a young boy during Shakespeare's time to appear knowledgeable. That's a fact I learned in primary school and I'm from Eastern Europe, it's hardly impressive. She can only relate to a book if one of the main characters is a child, what a tragic waste of an English literature degree.