Wow calling all social workers sexual abusers makes her look completely normal and not at all like someone with the sort of temperament that would argue with a sponge.Reann platforming another sick twisted fantasist who's lost custody of a child and projecting all her failures onto professionals
Covered in faeces would be abhorrent but it’s come from somewhere. Perhaps the girl was soiled and the parents had not brought the supplies to keep her clean and dignified such as a change of clothes, continence pads etc. This is basic personal care and the hospital of all places would’ve had changing facilities. Leaving people in their own waste leads to skin breakdown and sores which can be very hard to heal. So maybe not covered in faeces, but I would hazard a guess that there were instances where the care provided by the parents was woefully neglectful.There was a second email from someone confirming that the accusations of the daughter being covered in feces were untrue.
However, I maintain my view that children don’t just get removed from families without very good reason. Rarely for one single isolated incident, either. There’s a lot that Reann isn’t sharing. As is her right, of course. But cherry-picking parts of the story that make her look favourable and others look like the enmy doesn’t do her credibility much good
This really pinpoints everything that makes me so uncomfortable about the accusation in that report. Authorities were clearly uneasy about that childs level of care.Covered in faeces would be abhorrent but it’s come from somewhere. Perhaps the girl was soiled and the parents had not brought the supplies to keep her clean and dignified such as a change of clothes, continence pads etc. This is basic personal care and the hospital of all places would’ve had changing facilities. Leaving people in their own waste leads to skin breakdown and sores which can be very hard to heal. So maybe not covered in faeces, but I would hazard a guess that there were instances where the care provided by the parents was woefully neglectful.
Covered in faeces would be abhorrent but it’s come from somewhere. Perhaps the girl was soiled and the parents had not brought the supplies to keep her clean and dignified such as a change of clothes, continence pads etc. This is basic personal care and the hospital of all places would’ve had changing facilities. Leaving people in their own waste leads to skin breakdown and sores which can be very hard to heal. So maybe not covered in faeces, but I would hazard a guess that there were instances where the care provided by the parents was woefully neglectful.
I think the soiling had to have happened regularly in health and education settings. Along with other things or behaviours from the parents which would cause alarm. It's also disturbing that they didn't catheterise the poor child or teach them how to do it. It might not be the only medical procedure they didn't bother with.This really pinpoints everything that makes me so uncomfortable about the accusation in that report. Authorities were clearly uneasy about that childs level of care.
I think that second email was worded in such a way by that particular professional that they had never witnessed A being neglected personally themself, not that it hadn’t happened or been seen by someone else.There was a second email from someone confirming that the accusations of the daughter being covered in feces were untrue.
However, I maintain my view that children don’t just get removed from families without very good reason. Rarely for one single isolated incident, either. There’s a lot that Reann isn’t sharing. As is her right, of course. But cherry-picking parts of the story that make her look favourable and others look like the enmy doesn’t do her credibility much good
Been chopping at her fringe with safety scissors again I see!'My choice not to see her'. I'm sorry, what??? That horrendous fact just dropped into one of her pity party posts about losing custody of eldest.
---
Congratulations on the hotdogs being hidden behind a nice jumper but points deducted for the eyebrow game again.
---
Are kids like handbags to Reann? Lost 1 but never mind, got some others. Absolutely gobsmacked that she dares to think she has the higher moral ground about anything in light of that. You would want to see your kid at any cost. Suddenly crystal clear why social services have such a dim view of her innit? They must be aware she's chosen no contact with the one they removed. Why should they attribute any good faith to her after that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?