I'm reposting on here so hopefully some one can answer for meWas it a dodgy area she was walking through then? I'm not very familiar with London, I've only ever stayed in Hampstead with my aunt or in Kensington when I've visited. I knew South London was rough but I thought it was further south like Croydon areas.
Poster on the previous thread said this about the area:I'm reposting on here so hopefully some one can answer for me
I lived on Clarence a Avenue for 10 years and have walked that route all times of day and night without ever having a problem. Thornton Ward has a below average crime rate for London and Brixton Hill bang on average. I think this is actually what makes this all the more shocking, despite what people seem to be claiming this is not actually a dangerous part of the world.
I think people will have different opinions on this. As I mentioned in a previous post, the crime rate in the areas Sarah walked through are either just below average or average. It is being heavily developed, with older council house blocks being knocked down and replaced by new builds that provide a mix of private and social housing. It’s a mixed area, but I lived in one of the tower blocks of what were previously council flats there for 10 years without a problem and would regularly walk back from Clapham, Balham or Brixton alone, three sheets to the wind late at night. I think it’s relatively typical for zone 2 London and there is an undercurrent of some gang activity although I think this is a bit more prevalent a bit further north of this area towards Stockwell.I'm reposting on here so hopefully some one can answer for me
Thank you! I didn't see that previouslyPoster on the previous thread said this about the area:
I’m local as well. No it’s not known as a dodgy place despite what the Daily Mail readers would have you think. Lots of young professionals and families live round there. Main road she took isreally busy generally (though maybe quieter in lockdown) and well lit so I understand why she felt safe to walk there. The one thing I’d say about the area is that it can turn from very fancy gentrified roads into more dodgy council estates quite quickly. But overall the portrayal of her route being super dangerous just isn’t true -of course - anything can happen anywhere and perhaps she was in the wrong place wrong time.I'm reposting on here so hopefully some one can answer for me
I walked through the park area at night and it was one of the scariest things I’ve done. I think maybe because I was a bit drunk and I’m not from that area (I got lost when I was out and about with friends). I don’t know what it was, but something really spooked me that night.I'm reposting on here so hopefully some one can answer for me
I’ve been following this case too for the same reasons I imagine most of us have done similar and it’s especially frightening if something ‘random’ did happen to her.I really hope they find her soon. I can’t stop following her story. I think lots of us on Tattle will resonate with Sarah Everard: absolutely “average” woman, early 30s, missing doing a very mundane and everyday task- walking.
I don’t think they look the same. Wouldn’t it have been spotted earlier in such an obvious spot?I can’t stop thinking about this story, agree that hat looks like it’s been put there on purpose.
Had a look again, it doesn’t look like the CCTV one has a bobble on it, could be the angle.
I’ve just read that the police have ruled out it being hersI don’t think they look the same. Wouldn’t it have been spotted earlier in such an obvious spot?
I got the impression that was irresponsible use of a stock photo as it doesn’t look like the same hat. Plus why would there be an opportunity for the press to get near it and the police would not release a photo like that in the media.I can’t stop thinking about this story, agree that hat looks like it’s been put there on purpose.
Had a look again, it doesn’t look like the CCTV one has a bobble on it, could be the angle.