A genuine question because I've seen a lot about atonement in the last few pages. What do people think is an appropriate level of atonement for two lives? Because that's the thing with murder. It's absolutely final for the victim. Basically what price do you set on human life? The atonement you need to carry out is set by the court. You can appeal that if you think it's unfair, but it IS the atonement that you are set.
Let's also not create a martyr out of Ronald Sanford. Read the caselaw decision, which is based on the facts, for balance to an agenda driven change.org petition. These elderly ladies were his neighbours, they were known to Sanford, selected because of their vulnerability, and each were stabbed multiple times. Can you think of a reason other than to kill, which would require multiple stabbings? Self defence? Both ladies were in their 80s and would have been no threat to him even at 13.
Just because a guy is articulate doesn't make him innocent. Wasn't Ted Bundy notoriously personable?
The criminal justice system is a system (obviously), and the absolute basics of any system is there are loopholes and failures. It’s not possible in any system to plug these: you fix one vulnerability and another pops up elsewhere. The legal system exists to maintain this system, and keep
It as safe as possible.
there is no criminal justice system that every member of the population agrees with. I think the English / Welsh system is excellent, and am not aware of a better one. bearing in mind, as above, in any system you must accept loopholes and failures.
I don’t believe the Criminal justice system delivers “atonement”. I think it exists to prove rehabilitation and protect the public. This is achieved to some degree through punishment, the withdrawal of basic freedoms.
I think what people really can’t accept when they post as above is humankind. We are intelligent mammals who built a society with protections and systems. But we are violent- we murder people. We always have and always will. If you’re coming from a place of preventing any murder through punishment, you’re coming from the wrong place. As a poster already said it’s been shown time and time again that punishment no matter how severe isn’t a deterrent.