“Ultimately and in the end” is that not the same thing? To me they mean the same thing in this context. Awful writer.
Her first book was so poorly written, how has she got a deal for #2?Thread suggestion:
PTWM #30 PTWM churns out another book, but will she ever admit that she’s a massive crook?!
How many chapters will she include about the trolls I wonder?I’m confused... I thought her new book was fiction, but sounds like she’s writing about herself again.
Because her followers will all go out and buy it regardless, so they can Instagram it and maybe get reposted by their queen so will make money regardless of how shite it is. Look at Hinch - she's done one half empty (colouring pages, dot to dot of her bloody dog and spot the difference on the cleaning products), and followed it up with an empty one (for your Hinch lists) and morons have lapped it up.Her first book was so poorly written, how has she got a deal for #2?
Makes me angry that these idiots can get book deals when so many talented writers go unnoticedBecause her followers will all go out and buy it regardless, so they can Instagram it and maybe get reposted by their queen so will make money regardless of how shite it is. Look at Hinch - she's done one half empty (colouring pages, dot to dot of her bloody dog and spot the difference on the cleaning products), and followed it up with an empty one (for your Hinch lists) and morons have lapped it up.
R exaggerate?! Don’t be daftI think I’d be more interested in reading the side of the stories of all other people in the book that she slandered. I am a safeguarding lead in a school and my parents foster lots of very vulnerable children. She said that S and Is court case was one of the worst, had their own cafcas officers ect. Some of worst I’ve been involved in include the children changing their identity, even the school aren’t allowed their home address (we are given a PO Box to send correspondence), the children aren't allowed on any school photos ect. I can’t help but feel that she totally exaggerated on that. Please don’t misjudge what I am saying - any court case for a child is horrible - but she’s happy to plaster them, their address, their school ect all over Instagram
Exactly. I could easily track Isaac down, I know his home postcode and school due to info Rachel has shared. It wouldn’t take much for his mum or her family to find him.I think I’d be more interested in reading the side of the stories of all other people in the book that she slandered. I am a safeguarding lead in a school and my parents foster lots of very vulnerable children. She said that S and Is court case was one of the worst, had their own cafcas officers ect. Some of worst I’ve been involved in include the children changing their identity, even the school aren’t allowed their home address (we are given a PO Box to send correspondence), the children aren't allowed on any school photos ect. I can’t help but feel that she totally exaggerated on that. Please don’t misjudge what I am saying - any court case for a child is horrible - but she’s happy to plaster them, their address, their school ect all over Instagram
Do you think she’s writing about family members and ex’s again? Surely she can’t be popular where she lives if she slags everyone off in her booksJust reading that excerpt is interesting. She’s talking about people “never being happy“ , “looking for better things” and “leaving a trail of destruction as they go.”
Does that remind you of anyone?
Er....yeah....take a look in the mirror Rach as that’s you with the trial of destruction behind you?
Her first book was so poorly written, how has she got a deal for #2?
I thought that, I'd have found it so odd if any of my friend's mum's posted that for my birthday, and I've known my best friend since I was 4What the hell is wrong with her?! She’s your child’s friend not yours you sad cow!
Oh sweet lordIf she genuinely cared about that kid, she'd question why the girl has her Paypal details in the bio. Why is a child practically begging for money from strangers?????
** the girls PayPal details, not PTWM's details