I don’t doubt she had some issues and with majority of addictions, there is some sort of trauma there which can cause it to escalate and I think they have done everything in their power to constantly push her to the point where it’s probably ridiculously hard to fully recover.But what must s and I seen of Sam that meant they believed it. What must have happened to make them not want their mum!?
I feel like everyone is missing that point; she drew attention to it. You’re playing into her hands, she know the Huns will buy into the lie of the chrolls being high and mighty about alcohol and an “underage” kid and take her side when in reality most of us DGAF about it! He also had a massive multi-pack of crisps… which his girlfriend bought; it’s probably her bottle or partly hers and they’d only just unpacked from the festival, that’s why it’s in the room.You'd have thought they'd have a bit more awareness and cautiousness around alcohol then seeing as the boys were so traumatised by S's alcoholism. Yet here they are, almost like they're not bothered by it at all. Or bothered by their dad being surgically attached to a drip of Merlot and their step mum downing the fizzy cat's piss when she doesn't even like the taste. I'm all for not making alcohol taboo around teenagers - I did notice the bottle in his room, but I was likeuntil she drew attention to it. I did think it was wine, not vodka, though.
They probably did want her, same as T wanted a relationship with her dad until very recently. But R has made sure to put a stop to that as wellBut what must s and I seen of Sam that meant they believed it. What must have happened to make them not want their mum!?
Rabies doesn't like those kids having other adult influences that she doesn't have control over. Bratsy chose not to have a relationship with her dad, fair enough. Lula wanted to but was stopped/made to feel guilty about it. They both had close relationships with their older sisters, until Ratshit fell out with their mum and they were all immediately cut off. Edie has a great relationship with her dad, but he had to fight through court for it (for no reason other than Ratchet wanted to play happy families with Sloshy). Not to mention all the "best friends" who have been and gone over the years, such as Stabby Jo, Emily, Cocaine Katy, who were all lauded as "treating the kids as their own" but have now disappeared for one reason or another. No doubt the latest ones (Jen, Dani) will also disappear at some point, leaving those kids feeling like people drift in and out of their lives.They probably did want her, same as T wanted a relationship with her dad until very recently. But R has made sure to put a stop to that as well
I don’t doubt she had some issues and with majority of addictions, there is some sort of trauma there which can cause it to escalate and I think they have done everything in their power to constantly push her to the point where it’s probably ridiculously hard to fully recover.
On the other hand, I do think kids are very very easy to manipulate and she goes into far much detail with strangers online so I hate to think just how much detail and what stories she tells behind closed doors.
Addiction is an illness and I think if the person is willing to get help then you meet them in the middle. I can’t fathom how a woman’s advocate truly thinks that by completely denying all access and bashing someone online, in podcasts and social media will ever help them to recover.
I don’t think it’s anything like this.But what must s and I seen of Sam that meant they believed it. What must have happened to make them not want their mum!?
I hope they both get to an age where they can make decisions for themselves and show Scratchet the big middle finger.They probably did want her, same as T wanted a relationship with her dad until very recently. But R has made sure to put a stop to that as well
He's just pathetic isn't he. Although I have my suspicions that she runs his account!Hi Joshua, does your wife pay the £9.99 a month for your blue tick or do you pay it out of your pocket money? You certainly don't have the reputation to just be given one.
I don’t doubt she had some issues and with majority of addictions, there is some sort of trauma there which can cause it to escalate and I think they have done everything in their power to constantly push her to the point where it’s probably ridiculously hard to fully recover.
On the other hand, I do think kids are very very easy to manipulate and she goes into far much detail with strangers online so I hate to think just how much detail and what stories she tells behind closed doors.
Addiction is an illness and I think if the person is willing to get help then you meet them in the middle. I can’t fathom how a woman’s advocate truly thinks that by completely denying all access and bashing someone online, in podcasts and social media will ever help them to recover.
R & J happened! They emotionally manipulated those boys in the same way they’ve emotionally manipulated B & L to believe they’re broken babies.But what must s and I seen of Sam that meant they believed it. What must have happened to make them not want their mum!?
I’m always careful when it comes to accusing someone of paternal alienation as you never 100% know the full story. But what are the chances of having 5 children with 3 different parents and all those 3 parents have at some point had their visitation stooped and had to go through the courts. 1 shitty parent I could understand, 2 shitty parents I would have concern but 3 clearly shows a pattern.R & J happened! They emotionally manipulated those boys in the same way they’ve emotionally manipulated B & L to believe they’re broken babies.
The fact that she has 4 kids by 3 dads, And that those dads have other kids with other women and she still calling us on the internet weirdos and unstable..I’m always careful when it comes to accusing someone of paternal alienation as you never 100% know the full story. But what are the chances of having 5 children with 3 different parents and all those 3 parents have at some point had their visitation stooped and had to go through the courts. 1 shitty parent I could understand, 2 shitty parents I would have concern but 3 clearly shows a pattern.
I even read her first book and I still don’t know what her reason was for stopping E from seeing her dad. I assume neither of them like the other one having ties with anyone they were previously romantically involved with.
It's ridiculous, given that she has always pushed the "perfect patchwork family" narrative, when actually part of being a blended family is juggling different contact arrangements, how to deal with the kids when one is taken away on holiday by their other parent etc, making the effort to maintain that co-parenting relationship to do the best for the child. It's all the more grating that she's always bleating about parental alienation, and praising the "women at the centre" who have lost their kids and got them back, she used to also rave about Trevi and how they support women who are dealing with addiction to stay with their children, while simultaneously keeping 2 children from their mum citing her addiction as the reasonI’m always careful when it comes to accusing someone of paternal alienation as you never 100% know the full story. But what are the chances of having 5 children with 3 different parents and all those 3 parents have at some point had their visitation stooped and had to go through the courts. 1 shitty parent I could understand, 2 shitty parents I would have concern but 3 clearly shows a pattern.
I even read her first book and I still don’t know what her reason was for stopping E from seeing her dad. I assume neither of them like the other one having ties with anyone they were previously romantically involved with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?