He's fully checked out, isn't he? It would piss me off if my partner was doing that, and I'd call her out on it. But then when Sloshy is ranting about shoes left on the floor, teeth being brushed in the kitchen sink, and empty loo rolls not being replaced, all Ratshit ever does is snort and film it. She never backs him up, so why should he back her up? They're a sham of a marriage and family.I actually feel a bit sorry for old Ma Hambleton <I’ll get my coat>.
Old Merlot Mike has absolutely no interest in the kids at all, with the exception of playing dinosaur with Wibble. She’s looking to Twiggy for back up and he’s ignoring her, ignoring Seb and fixating on “van life”. She’s the one dealing with Seb’s incessant badgering for cash (yes it’s her fault for always giving in) and his actual behaviour, whilst Joyce wilfully ignores family life as it’s happening around him. We know she’s a shit parent, but fucking hell, Silky doesn’t even pretend to have a go at being a dad.
What the hell is going on and why is all this being brought up randomlyOh she's still here alright. Still waiting for an apology for throwing Tattle under the bus by writing an article on her Blog slagging off the members on this thread who helped her big time when she claimed " Tracey Black" aka Rachaele was sending her threatening messages - alot of posters here called BS on this then in 2019 and I still do. She used Tattle and members on here to increase her own online presence and career as well as preach her political leaning . One of the most liked posts on this thread from @BigMama was an open letter to Keels asking here to explain why she treated Tattle Members such. Still waiting for a reply.......
I do wonder what happened to the more vocal objectors from those days, whether they lurk now just have different user names or just had enough of whole shitshow. Alot of folk felt then that alot of damage to the cause as we lost alot of more active members - and this is why I'm concerned that Tattle is now (temporarily?) a closed forum - we need more blood, and old, on this page. Anyone wants more info on the controversy around Keels please look at thread 11 - p15 to around about 30.
I know it's all in the past but it's an essential part of PTWM history especially when Keels is still obviously here. I personally found it insulting that she dare call VCJR "the wildcard " of this thread when she was continually called out herself for her questionable, bordering on the obsession, interest in PTWM - masquerading her "methods" (some may indeed refer to it as stalking) as journalistic license. I do wonder if another article is being crafted again using us all here as blogger material.....that's why I just recommend other posters here be very wary. It's not cliquey towards newer members to go over old ground - it's just a gentle reminder from the past.
Peace and love and all that..
So true.They're a sham of a marriage and family.
there has been many wild cards on here over the years but as with anything we can choose to ignore if we want tooOh she's still here alright. Still waiting for an apology for throwing Tattle under the bus by writing an article on her Blog slagging off the members on this thread who helped her big time when she claimed " Tracey Black" aka Rachaele was sending her threatening messages - alot of posters here called BS on this then in 2019 and I still do. She used Tattle and members on here to increase her own online presence and career as well as preach her political leaning . One of the most liked posts on this thread from @BigMama was an open letter to Keels asking here to explain why she treated Tattle Members such. Still waiting for a reply.......
I do wonder what happened to the more vocal objectors from those days, whether they lurk now just have different user names or just had enough of whole shitshow. Alot of folk felt then that alot of damage to the cause as we lost alot of more active members - and this is why I'm concerned that Tattle is now (temporarily?) a closed forum - we need more blood, and old, on this page. Anyone wants more info on the controversy around Keels please look at thread 11 - p15 to around about 30.
I know it's all in the past but it's an essential part of PTWM history especially when Keels is still obviously here. I personally found it insulting that she dare call VCJR "the wildcard " of this thread when she was continually called out herself for her questionable, bordering on the obsession, interest in PTWM - masquerading her "methods" (some may indeed refer to it as stalking) as journalistic license. I do wonder if another article is being crafted again using us all here as blogger material.....that's why I just recommend other posters here be very wary. It's not cliquey towards newer members to go over old ground - it's just a gentle reminder from the past.
Peace and love and all that..
Who called her a wild card?I think I might read this thread from the beginning. This keels malarkey has me intrigued as that was way before i joined. Especially if potentially still relevant now if they’re still posting but under another name etc.
I also remember The “wildcard” quote to VCJR which I thought unnecessary and uncalled for at the time. But now I need to connect the dots
Haha well if the beginning is just as wacky maybe I won’t botherWho called her a wild card?
I need to go back to bed because I'm so confused. The beginning threads are just as wacky
Bingo! She’s done nothing but undermine him to the children for years, she has created the monsters that her teenagers are and continues to enable them. Watching the way she and Seb behave together actually makes me feel nauseous, it’s just wrong on so many levels. Why does she film it all? Who sits there enjoying an evening with family and films it all?He's fully checked out, isn't he? It would piss me off if my partner was doing that, and I'd call her out on it. But then when Sloshy is ranting about shoes left on the floor, teeth being brushed in the kitchen sink, and empty loo rolls not being replaced, all Ratshit ever does is snort and film it. She never backs him up, so why should he back her up? They're a sham of a marriage and family.
Oh wow, I just read that bigmama’s post and that is some sad readingHaha well if the beginning is just as wacky maybe I won’t bother
Yeah I see your point, didn’t think of it that way. But he’s usually ranting at the objects in question and not engaging in person with the kid who caused the mess. All very non-communicative and quite frankly weird.He's fully checked out, isn't he? It would piss me off if my partner was doing that, and I'd call her out on it. But then when Sloshy is ranting about shoes left on the floor, teeth being brushed in the kitchen sink, and empty loo rolls not being replaced, all Ratshit ever does is snort and film it. She never backs him up, so why should he back her up? They're a sham of a marriage and family.
It's me. I'm meant to be KeelsWhat the hell is going on and why is all this being brought up randomly
Vcjr joined here way after keels left so I'm sooo confusedwho is keels supposed to be on here now?
Thankfully there is something called the "Barred List" in the UK. So if he tried for another force/agency or anything like that, he would appear when they checkedWithout totally outing myself, I work for an ambulance service and we dismissed someone for gross misconduct (various reasons, including neglecting patient care, concerns over clinical competence, using inappropriate language etc), that person now works for a private ambulance service in the same role, despite us having provided a reference stating that they were dismissed for gross misconduct
But he wouldn’t because “the officer” who was sacked wasn’t namedThankfully there is something called the "Barred List" in the UK. So if he tried for another force/agency or anything like that, he would appear when they checked
The list is maintained by The College of Policing. Even though he wasn't publically named the internal processes would have occurredBut he wouldn’t because “the officer” who was sacked wasn’t named
I know that, but any private agency he applied to wouldn’t be able to access that informationThe list is maintained by The College of Policing. Even though he wasn't publically named the internal processes would have occurred
Ah, apologies my brain cell is on a go slow.I know that, but any private agency he applied to wouldn’t be able to access that information
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?