He looks like "The Head" of Art Attack
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
As someone who has worked in this field I can categorically agree that nothing is or should be discussed, even where names are not used. That’s not just because of the very obvious safeguarding situation, or the fact that everyone deserves the right to privacy or because ethically it’s poor conduct to discuss things for the purposes of engagement on SM. It’s also because people are simply trying to do their jobs to their best of their ability. I wouldn’t even consider going on socials to discuss the people I have worked with, professionally or service users. It wouldn’t cross my mind that another professional would think to do the same. The professional world and SM do not collide. It’s only people like R, playing shops, with zero understanding of what she is doing that would think it’s appropriate. I’m still appalled that she has been able to get away with ‘selling’ all the content, timings, feedback, flip chart comments etc around her knock off programme, which let’s face it has probably only been accessed by ‘huns’ wanting to spend a couple of hours in the presence of their queen. Likely the same demographic queuing to see her on her book ‘tour’.
I wish I could say what I work in and what this person is involved in. Anyway this person knows quite a lot and knows of all the scammers in Torbay which there is far too many of. It sounds like her continuing to milk people out of their money and pretend she's running a women's centre/refuge/freedom course etc etc and alleging that she works with social services and personally meets all the judges in the country, and nothing can be done about it. I'm glad she's not getting any more money from the council.Ooooh I'm intrigued!!
Can't stand ellie W. Evil manipulative cow.
Any way back to the other evil
I work with torbay council (not for so don't bother trying to report me Ratshit) children's services and no one, and I mean no one will work with her.
I've been told her recent funding is the last she'll receive as she isn't doing what she claims to be doing (helping x amount of women, no paper work to back it up). I wish I could get more info but looks weird constantly asking about Ratshit
Also that Sloshy was sacked. That's probably all any of us will ever know
This could be why she's pushing the patchwork patreon so much. Need to pay Jen, Jayne and Dani somehow and she won't do that out of her ptwm funds!I wish I could say what I work in and what this person is involved in. Anyway this person knows quite a lot and knows of all the scammers in Torbay which there is far too many of. It sounds like her continuing to milk people out of their money and pretend she's running a women's centre/refuge/freedom course etc etc and alleging that she works with social services and personally meets all the judges in the country, and nothing can be done about it. I'm glad she's not getting any more money from the council.
Also that Sloshy was sacked. That's probably all any of us will ever know
bit tight Rach, making their way up to floss your teeth are they!?
she's at 3365 follower's on patreon at the moment (i'm sure she had 4000 at one point) If all of them are paying the lowest subscription of £5 per month, that's £16,825 she makes EVERY MONTH. With all the begging she does on FB and insta for donations there is no way a penny of that goes back to the (non existent) women she helps
I honestly don’t know how she sleeps at night. It’s all so very wrong.
very, the majority of her followers probably don't even earn that in a year.
I think the only time Josh can "safely" critique her is in the lives. Discussing the kids, he was saying something about putting on a united front, and not having her laughing behind him when he is telling someone off. Ragin' Rachel grimaced and vaguely said she doesn't do that. Bet if Joycie said this without cameras she would have kicked off big time, grabbed him by what's left of his ravaged goolies and slung him out of the hobbit hole.
This is what Joyce’s life has become … from pigeon police to sitting in his attic slagging his kids off for money !! What a role model is he.
Patchwork Birthday Prize Draw - Comments
We're running this prize draw to raise money for The Patchwork House Women's Centre CIC
www.crowdfunder.co.uk
some of the comments on this latest prize draw are just
how can none of the 642 people that have donated question where the money goes.
Nearly £17k a month, yet she still has to ask for supermarket vouchers, school uniform donations, random prams and other baby stuff etc. And that money is on top of her advert income (the brands from the US that are emailing sappy Jo throughout the night), anything made from the sales in the tat shop and the REBL sweatshop tracksuits, and some will still be paying PayPal to her every month.
I wonder why she hasn't done a big beg for food and Easter eggs, too busy letting all the huns look at her camel toe in bookshops?
Iv not caught up yet because iv been a parent and took my kids out for the morning. So not sure if this has been repeated yet but when I see that screenshot all I see is this....
Attachments
I’m sorry don’t hate me & I know I’ve said it before
She is 100% the abusive 1 not Josh he just no’s How to react to her
She’s toxic
He’s a tosser tho grow balls get your boys & live happily without her
When you start to go down on your wife and get a whiff of her fishy thrush flaps
There’s been loads on the Spotted Paignton page about groups of kids smoking weed and beating up kids who are on their own. These two never seem to even know where theirs are and the boys would probably rather be anywhere rather than at home 
Rachel is definitely abusive. She's toxic to the core. Josh is abusive of those kids (especially Seb). He's a coward who's bullied (by R) and takes it out on someone younger/smaller/vulnerable.
shocking
awful women she is
Totally agree.
I’m going to try and make this make sense in writing and I hope it comes across how I mean it…
I sometimes wonder if J is mean to S because if he wasn’t then she would be. His thinking is that he’s not going to treat him as badly as she would if he didn’t. Does that make sense?
Or maybe I’m giving him too much credit and he’s just a twit!
- Status