like I said, lighten up.
PTWM #148 Josh is on the horny viking pills but they still can’t cure Rach of all her ills
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Another one that's only 3 miles away from where rach lives.
This is why you protect your kids head.
"Teacher guilty of downloading hundreds of child abuse images - Devon Live" https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/teacher-guilty-downloading-hundreds-child-7647831
This is why you protect your kids head.
"Teacher guilty of downloading hundreds of child abuse images - Devon Live" https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/teacher-guilty-downloading-hundreds-child-7647831
This has broken me!
Rancid, if you don't read these posts and laugh out loud sometimes, then you really are beyond saving. PS, safeguard your kids.
We all know that the family had Covid before and R said it was a chest infection, E's Nan had outed them on a post on Facebook about E having Covid. They've been completely in denial about Covid, they didn't give a tit about the rules. So I do actually believe they've all had/got it again.
oh the irony super cute you even think I need to lighten up. Is that your big standard response to everyone who disagrees?!Your hilarious
But remember they lived like they were in tier 4 the whole way through
But remember, Rachel has said before that its everyone else who has the problem for seeing anything "wrong" with what she shares and its others who have the problem.
She won't even have accountability for her own abusive and neglectful behaviour in her own house, nevermind care about it happening in her area.
Just as long as she pretends to care enough to keep the donations coming in to keep her in tit clothes, she's fine
I remember him. He had a documentary coming out and she’d latched herself firmly on to him. Went to visit him and really plastered his face all over her socials. Alex decided he didn’t want social media and shut it down as he said he wanted to protect his children. He was never mentioned again by her. Not even in passing.
*You’re*
Your hilarious
He lives in Paignton so not even 3 miles away but actually in the same town as her.
There's always something a bit odd about people who cream themselves over correcting a grammatical area.You beat me to it
Going back to last week’s troll outing fest, happened to bump in to a friend who works in the legal department of a local council. Ran the council lady situation by her & this what she said may have happened. Any query/ complaint of this nature would have been passed on to that council’s legal team for response, even bypassing HR. The response would have been that they cannot confirm or deny that a particular person works for them as this is a breach of GDPR. This where it gets interesting:
if for example that person did work for the council but was innocent ie had profile hacked & this had caused alarm or distress to that individual as well as being incorectly outed/doxxed on a public platform, they may take legal action themselves or pass on to the police in support of their employee. They may even ask for the posts to be taken down as they are defamatory towards the council. Maybe that’s why Rach glossed over the response she’d received & that’s why she’s not troll hunting any more
if for example that person did work for the council but was innocent ie had profile hacked & this had caused alarm or distress to that individual as well as being incorectly outed/doxxed on a public platform, they may take legal action themselves or pass on to the police in support of their employee. They may even ask for the posts to be taken down as they are defamatory towards the council. Maybe that’s why Rach glossed over the response she’d received & that’s why she’s not troll hunting any more
Im blocked so don’t know what response if any she’s had from them but I can imagine it wouldn’t be a top priority for the council!Going back to last week’s troll outing fest, happened to bump in to a friend who works in the legal department of a local council. Ran the council lady situation by her & this what she said may have happened. Any query/ complaint of this nature would have been passed on to that council’s legal team for response, even bypassing HR. The response would have been that they cannot confirm or deny that a particular person works for them as this is a breach of GDPR. This where it gets interesting:
if for example that person did work for the council but was innocent ie had profile hacked & this had caused alarm or distress to that individual as well as being incorectly outed/doxxed on a public platform, they may take legal action themselves or pass on to the police in support of their employee. They may even ask for the posts to be taken down as they are defamatory towards the council. Maybe that’s why Rach glossed over the response she’d received & that’s why she’s not troll hunting any more
Attachments
Another day, another opportunity to post bratsy in her pants hungover 
I hope your day improves if this is the highlight so far
I have Covid (definitely not tonsilitis), so my days are pretty tit right nowI hope your day improves if this is the highlight so far
- Status