Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Happytobedivorced

Active member
The latest update on MEN is horrific regarding the bruising on Preston’s bottom. Not sure if of I should type it though - can someone please explain how to put things behind a ‘spoiler’?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5

Moronic

Well-known member
Yes, I noticed the Jurassic Park t-shirt and also the crying for his Mum 😡
I wonder how he's coping on remand? I can't find which prison he's in but I saw that McGowan was in Frankland, which is known as Monster Mansion, along with Wakefield.
I reckon he's looking at 18 years minimum, if he's found guilty, as that is what the murderers of both Leiland James Corkhill and Elsie Scully Hicks got, and they are very similar cases, in fact this case is worse because of the SA.
Regarding McGowan, I really don't know if he'll be found guilty, in those other cases, the husbands were not found guilty of allowing the deaths.
In Elsie's case, I'm not even sure if the husband was charged with anything?
if he’s found guilty would he not get a whole life order?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5

SamPam

Well-known member
I’d be interested to know if JV’s mum is in court supporting him or not.

Does anybody know if the jury will be shown pictures of the bruising or is it just being described to them?
I’m pretty sure they are shown photographs of the bruising visible on his body 🥲
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 5

zogsmum

Active member
McGowan-Fazackerley's car seen returning to house on CCTV, jurors told
A short voice call was made from Mr Varley’s phone to his partner’s at 17.34. That is the last action on Mr Varley’s phone before McGowan-Fazackerley returned.
Mr McGowan-Fazackerley’s car was captured on CCTV travelling back towards Staining Road at 18.14pm.
A minute later, the phone’s location was outside the house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5

Nelly's mum

VIP Member
How on earth did that little boy’s trousers go mouldy??
Disgusting and depraved .
JV took the trousers to the police, he said Preston was wearing them the day he died. JV said he'd had put them in the laundry basket and they'd gone mouldy by the time JV and JFM were allowed back into the house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
They tested the bath and found that it didn’t leak 👏🏼 this completely fucks a significant part of his story as there should have been water still in the bath at the time the police went to the house and he’d already confirmed that he didn’t drain the tub nor did John have time.
Didn't he say he fixed the leak that morning though with the glue? Sure they said plastic was found in the bath wonder what that was aswell
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

nothinonyou

VIP Member
Confused about John's job he worked in sales right? How come some papers are saying he has a child facing role and he used to work in south shore academy as an exams invigilator?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

Islawight

VIP Member
Prosecution is always first with evidence and witnesses. So we do hear the most damning at the start. Then it’s down to the defence to argue before jury go to deliberations.
No, it’s not unusual to release footage once it’s been shown in court for a high profile case.
Can anyone ELI5 please. The triall is estimated to last 6 to 6 weeks. Is it likely to follow a set format? 2 weeks in and it’s harrowing already so I’m wondering what will come out and when.

Also, I’m surprised at the footage that has already been released. Is this more than usual? It feels it to me and makes me wonder if we are moving towards the American way of allowing cameras im court rooms
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

AladdinSane

VIP Member
I imagine the forensic experts are agreeing to this because, if argued by the prosecution, it could be enough to insert reasonable doubt. So i am hoping that any further DNA evidence is clear cut
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

Kebab girl

VIP Member
Fwiw I didn't read your comment that way. The wording was sloppy in part but I agree mostly with the sentiment. I think the first part about being held in high regard is true, and the SW IS a prime example of that. I don't blame the hospital staff, they repeatedly raised issues, the SW whitewashed these issues.
I'm not sure if it was anything to do with their being gay men or just the general air of respectability they gave off, but she definitely wasn't seeing the wood for the trees.
Did the hospital raise issues? they reported the attendances (it’s an automatic alert for looked after kids) but my understanding was they reported no concerns with the hospital attendances. i.e no reports of a non accidental injury or concern over repeated attendances. I think that’s what I’ve read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

Melian

VIP Member
I don't think so. Heterosexual and homosexual couples are subject to the same assessment process. Discrimination- positive or negative is not allowed under equality law.
I have 2 female friends who are married and have adopted children. Their youngest has been in their care since she was 10 months old. 3 months after her third birthday, it went to court and they formally adopted her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4

sebanna

VIP Member
The update about the swabs taken from the cot didn’t show up for me. Anyone else? I wonder if was deleted. 16:08 is the last I can see
There from the 27 th April not yesterday. I presume it was mentioned in the opening speech and will be discussed later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4