Ahh so I wasn’t going crazy with not seeing it!I saw what you posted earlier and just been struggling to find it. Seems they have edited the DNA part out now
View attachment 3988827
Ahh so I wasn’t going crazy with not seeing it!I saw what you posted earlier and just been struggling to find it. Seems they have edited the DNA part out now
View attachment 3988827
I'm a social worker, and I'm hoping the general introduction process was around 1-2 weeks and was agreed as facts by all parties therefore didn't need to be covered in oral evidence.Our introductions were seven days. Day 1 spend an hour at foster care, day 2 a few hours, day 3 spend a morning and do the morning routine, day 4 spend the evening and do the bedtime, day 5 foster carers bring them to your house for a sleepover, day 6 a break so baby can have goodbyes with foster carers, day 7 collect them and take them home. That's usual for most people I know. Some do do bumps, where adopters turn up at the park or something a few times so baby recognises you.
Our foster carer put our pictures up around him too, at his level, in his cot etc so he was constantly seeing our faces. Prior to introductions we did video calls and although he didn't really interact with us on the calls, he heard our voices. We also sent voicenotes so our voices would be familiar to him. You create a scrapbook as well with photos of your home which foster carers can show them. It is really well thought out to be honest, it's not just swoop in and take them.
And they got away with so much for so long - no wonder they began to think they were invulnerable.Arrogance, it's surprising how many people think they're smarter than the people trained to investigate such cases.
I just double checked there, and the murderers of Elsie (her real name was Shayla, I should say, that's her birth name) and Leiland James both got life sentences with a minimum of 18 years.if he’s found guilty would he not get a whole life order?
And in-between the baths, Preston was filmed struggling to breathe?Grandmother bathed him in morning, Varley claims he bathed him again as he’d been sick plus Varley wanted to take a shower at the same time so he could watch the baby in the bath.
I can only imagine they mean when you can lower the side of the cot, that he was slumped over like that, propped up on his knees 🥲Also - I am really confused by the description of Preston slumped over the cot. I’m imagining him standing and leaning over but it sounds like he’s not breathing (lips blue etc) - how is he in this position? Wouldn’t he move away if they’re not holding him? Or has he been forced into that position for so long he now can’t?
Here's a link to the Lancs Live updates, they might work better for you:I’m finding following the trial live difficult for 2 reasons - obviously what is being reported is horrendous. That poor little boy. I feel for those in court having to hear it all and see things too.
The second reason is the live reporting on the Manchester post. As I’m working, I’m not able to follow real time most days so catch up at the end of the day and it only goes so far back so I miss most of the days reporting. I followed the Letby trail and didn’t have this problem, I could scroll all the way back and read the updates from the start of court. Is this a me thing or is it the site?
In the interests of trying to be balanced, at the time my 25 year old was a baby, I had a Labrador who would eat dirty nappiesI mean explicitly mentioning he threw it out of the window (who does that?!) The only reason I can think why someone would feel the need to lie like that would be if a nappy that would contain evidence had been put into M-F's car maybe to dispose of elsewhere, and to cover the fact it was in the car would be it being thrown from the window to him outside. Just a weird thing to tell someone you had done.
Where is this bit in the live reporting please? I must have missed this and can’t seem to find it on the Manchester live one I have been following although I’ve been having some troubles with it loading sometimesThere we go, Preston's DNA on their sex toys. Absolute monsters the pair of them
gay men tend to use snapchat a lotI don’t know anyone older than their early 20s who uses snapchat. It’s an odd thing for a couple in their late 30s to use to communicate
It looks like they were remanded into custody in June 2025, and I thought I saw before that McGowan appeared on video link from Frankland, at the next Court date, which was October 2025.Can anyone tell me if the accused are on remand or living in the community?
Are they still together ?
I can find the answers
That’s the part I can’t stop thinking about, that must be 100% positive proof. Some of the other charges are wishy washy.Same! This trial is really affecting my mental health, I literally cannot stop thinking about Preston. I’m sure I read somewhere that his bowels were punctured? Gosh that breaks my heart