- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Or.. Waiting for the tRUTH - watch this spacey.Christ - this really is amateur stuff. Never have I seen such a despicable person and situation unravel so publicly. The game is up, Phil - we know.
New thread suggestion;
Phillip Schofield #9 - Week 3 - Waiting for the truth - watch this spacey.
Ruth KNOWS.
Silence from the z-listers speaks volumes eh??
OrYes yes yes
"The tRUTH will out.."
"Phil in Paris with the 'Fam'; in too deep to end this sham".
It's real - I googled it.
What was he playing at!!!! No 57 year old should we be replying to children under 18years old! Specially not a 'celeb' I think that ITV should know about this. Because unless they go through these chats meticulously I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere else.. Surely this breaks ITV Code of Conduct!!!.
Hi, I've been checking on Twitter quite a few people who had posted in that Phillip Schofield had snapchated with them. I did not find any pattern of waiting until they turned 18, so the one I previously found that was only days after he'd turned 18 was probably just a coincidence.
I found their ages by going through their twitter accounts to confirm their ages via birthdays.
Most of his chats were with 18 years old males. At first they were all 18 then I found some older ones and eventually I found some girls that he'd replied to, their ages were from 20 down to 14 yrs old.
It does look dodgy, but still it's not concrete evidence that he was up to anything, as he might have just been replying to as many people as he could who'd contacted him. He may have just been wanting to be hip with the youngsters, no real evidence of anything, but could be viewed as inappropriate behaviour for an ITV presenter, but then again he did become a legendary snapchater sensation, with everyone wanting to follow him - so he wasn't exactly hiding anything. He even had a 2 week bromance with a 19 year old:
Watch Philip Schofield's Snapchat shout-out to his Redcar 'bro'
Matthew Welham, 19, started a two-week 'bromance' after drunkenly adding the TV star on Snapchatwww.gazettelive.co.uk
It's clear he was only interacting with the younger people, the people on snapchat ages vary so he could have chatted with older people, he does chat to one girls mother. Also I have noticed that he just had a snapchat(today) with a 24 year old girl.
Pic of the different ages that use snapchat here: https://i.ibb.co/0BBDq6b/verto-analytics-snapchat-uk-users.png
And here is a list of the people I've found who Phil chatted to on snapchat:
(All the twitter links go to the actual tweet, other links to pics verifying ages)
twitter.com/JakeChapman98 Jake was 18 yrs old
View attachment 87387
twitter.com/christianpw_ Christian was 18 yrs old
View attachment 87388
twitter.com/tomharris_19 unsure of Tom's age,
twitter.com/daf_williams989 Daf just turned 18 yrs old
View attachment 87314
twitter.com/MikeyQueen96 A girl Shauna was 14 when Phil replied
View attachment 87330
twitter.com/SuzanneCam01 Suzanne 20 yr old
View attachment 87333
twitter.com/Oliviawheatleyx Olivia, not sure of age
twitter.com/aivilomm Another Olivia, she was 18 almost 19
View attachment 87342
twitter.com/marcus_the_fish Phil messaged Marcus at 17 or 18 years old
View attachment 87345
twitter.com/lucasdawson24 Lucus was 18 yrs old
View attachment 87347
twitter.com/samgarwood_ Phil chatted to Sam when he was 16 yrs old
View attachment 87389
twitter.com/ELXGANZA Harry was 18 years old
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/w7KQf9P/Harry-Phil-schofe.jpg
twitter.com/niamhlinden98 Phil replying to 16 year old girl
View attachment 87390
twitter.com/anobrandon Brandon
twitter.com/AaronDodds1 Aaron
twitter.com/MeganAlexox Replied to Magan's mothers snapchat, so this one was not a youngster!!!
twitter.com/michaelrooke99 Michael
twitter.com/Sam1874_ Sam, Phil complemented his hairstyle
twitter.com/FEnticott Finn
twitter.com/naixxxo Nia (girl)
twitter.com/VisualsByGio Phil tells Gio he would rather give him a fiver to drink bleach and die (a strange one)
link to pic here: https://i.ibb.co/Hr3G3qN/C0-UVuoh-XAAAE30-L.jpg
twitter.com/nafe_hird Nafe, was 20 at the time
twitter.com/jayummz James
twitter.com/smxth_ Harv
At the end of Nicky Campbells Big debate this morning which was about racism and woke ness, NC who worked with PS at Radio 1 in 1989 made an ending statement along the lines of ‘ regarding Caroline Flack and the #be kind movement it’s a shame that some aren’t being kind’ subliminal or my mind working overtime, like he neede to get it out- it was completely unrelated to the topic discussed
As things stand, more than 2 weeks on, she is as complicit in the cover-up as anyone else. I understand the rationale for not speaking out in terms of her own career and future income, but I don't think she is any more or less worthy of credit than anyone else who is sitting on the knowledge that they have.
He undoubtedly has plenty of 'professional' front, but I think it will be what he sees in the eyes of his daughters that will leave him in no doubt how much hurt he has caused, and how he has diminished himself as a father. Yes, the public image will be supported with more stunts like the trip to Paris, but on an emotional level, he will know and they will know that things will never be the same again. That is the legacy he has to live with away from the cameras.
For me, its THIS. And the fact that he often seems to send direct messages in the early hours of the morning. There is nothing to suggest that PS has done anything illegal. He is a 'Snapchat sensation' and Snapchat is predominantly used by young people so that is who he wants to have following him and sending him messages that he can choose to reply to directly. Let's not be under illusion about who he is targeting through his Snapchatting, it is YOUNG people. The question is whether he is doing anything inappropriate or that counters the image/brand he has that is the reason he's on TM?
A good place to get stuffed!
Ruth probably signed a NDA when she joined this morning......which means she cant speak out however much she wants to..she would be sued, for thousands and lose her job. I dont think it's fair to blame her, there are a lot if people who work in a studio all of signed NDA's that's why no one talks! All of them know what's going on. NO ONE IS GOING TO TALK., FOR FEAR OF BEING SUED.
Just throwing out there... in this age of #metoo, where young women feel more empowered to call out inappropriate behaviour from a person of the opposite sex in a position of power, is this so for young men and a person of the same sex. Perhaps a gay man on here could comment? How confident would a young man feel about pointing out inappropriate behaviour from a male colleague? Would he be believed, taken seriously and helped? Is it treated the same now or is there still a long way to go before young men can also feel they have a voice? Talking to my husband, and his view is that there's nothing illegal so its ok (with older man approaching much younger man) until I put it in the context of our daughters at 18 with a 50+ co-worker coming on to them - then he doesn't think its ok anymore.
I'm not saying she is to blame anymore than anyone else - but neither is she due anymore credit. No-one can be forced to sign a NDA against their will, it is a choice taken. Of course anyone can be sued if they tell untruths about someone else. As stated, I understand her silence, but I don't hold her in any higher regard than others who are keeping quiet.
What Happens If Someone Breaks a Non-Disclosure Agreement? | FRONTLINE
For decades, Harvey Weinstein was able to keep his accusers quiet. One of the reasons: the powerful movie mogul used elaborate legal agreements — non-disclosure agreements — designed to enforce unbreakable silence.
www.pbs.org
If you want to work in the Entertainment Business you are asked to sign NDA's or you dont get the job it's as simple as that. I've signed a few in my time and I know if I hadn't been willing to I wouldn't have got the job, that's how it works I'm afraid.
Interesting. An NDA was originally to keep business secrets, so competitors wouldn't find out what a business was planning, which is reasonable. They've become something else entirely.What Happens If Someone Breaks a Non-Disclosure Agreement? | FRONTLINE
For decades, Harvey Weinstein was able to keep his accusers quiet. One of the reasons: the powerful movie mogul used elaborate legal agreements — non-disclosure agreements — designed to enforce unbreakable silence.www.pbs.org
There is a difference between a general corporate NDA signed when commencing employment, and one that is crafted to suppress a specific incident thereafter. Neither of us know the detail or chronology of such matters at ITV, but a NDA does not supersede UK law - and you cannot be forced to sign one. A person only chooses to sign one if it suits them in some way at that time. Once more, I understand her rationale, but she has made her own choices.
- Status