Yea I know how it worksI don't read that article like that at all. I explained on another thread that, when the press can't print the real story, like when there's an injunction in place, they usually run lots of inconsequential articles to keep the pressure on the person with the injunction, keep them in the news, keep people thinking about them. Articles that have no real context or don't even make sense sometimes. I've seen DM commentators saying already "enough of this now" due to the sheer bombardment. They're also careful about where they place the stories on the websites so sometimes maybe the story on their target will be underneath an article about what they're actually trying to get at.
Take a closer look at the tone of the weight loss article.
"So, with one secret revealed, will his weight loss secret be revealed too?"
"A secret he has kept for almost 27 years"
"However, this is not the only secret that Phillip revealed in recent years"
"Previously, the ITV presenter shared his weight loss secret with viewers of This Morning"
Look at how many times they have used the word "secret". But they don't care about his weight loss. To me, they are saying "we know your REAL secret Schofield and it's going to come out!"
Lots of what's called non stories leading up to the main story l, I just thought the fact his weight was mentioned a few hours after it had been analysed here was telling..
I have a little insight
Thanks for your insight too