The Last Supper, just need the 9 other disciples!!!This looks like a modern depiction of the Sistine Chapel. A truly sickening image.
View attachment 561042
The Last Supper, just need the 9 other disciples!!!This looks like a modern depiction of the Sistine Chapel. A truly sickening image.
View attachment 561042
Hopefully the last supper before a 20 year stretch!The Last Supper, just need the 9 other disciples!!!
That must have been v difficult for R and E as theyre not normally fake and we all know they dont really like him but they couldnt be nasty that day and look like they were homophobic.This looks like a modern depiction of the Sistine Chapel. A truly sickening image.
View attachment 561042
Similar scenario. I was talking to my (male) best friend earlier tonight and Philth came up in the conversation. We got round to talking about what has been posted on here today! . My friend is 55 (so not too far off Philths age) and he said, philth 'chatting' to the young guys in the early hours of the morning (drinking/drunk) is absolutely disgusting and so wrong. He was visibly repulsed by it!! 17 year old twin boys live 2 doors along from me and when I put that to him as an example of who Philth chats to during the night, he shook his head in disbelief and was totally disgusted and horrified! Unbelievable ITV are still protecting him!!Asked my husband, who is 40 (not Philths age) if he would message a 17 year old girl ? He looked horrified. Our daughter is 14. That’s is only 3 years older than her. He said I wouldn’t even want to message for a friendly chat! She’s a child not even fully developed and it would be disgusting. Even messaging a 21 year as a 40 year old man I wouldn’t want to do. So to think a 57 year old man thinks it’s acceptable blows my mind. It’s morally wrong on so many levels and quite frankly weird.
Hubby said if some 57 year old man was messaging my daughter in her first year of sixth form (17 years old) I would be furious. So why is it any different Phillip doing it to a 17 year old BOY?
I’m 36 - would I want to message a 17 year old BOY even for an ‘innocent’ chat??? No thanks
He raises some very interesting points! Yes... Why has Amanda's statement re the can of worms never been challenged or attempted to be silenced by his team like so much else? My personal opinion is that he knows its safer leaving it be, she KNOWS, if its challenged by his team then she will speak....
Exactly. Same with all the issues with Ruth Langsford. That's too much smoke if you ask me! I'm predicting we'll be seeing a big fire soon...He raises some very interesting points! Yes... Why has Amanda's statement re the can of worms never been challenged or attempted to be silenced by his team like so much else? My personal opinion is that he knows its safer leaving it be, she KNOWS, if its challenged by his team then she will speak....
What she has said really is the reason I believe that something shadey has happened and been covered up, by his team, by itv and by the press to an extent (they know but are either being gagged or are negotiating with him)
That's all my opinion of course
I absolutely love that guy I've seen him before on the Katie price thread and he always talks 100% sense.
I noticed that too. And Matthew Wright’s ponytailI don't watch TM but switched on earlier out of curiosity. Dark circles under your eyes today Phil!! Not able to sleep at the moment eh. Hmmm wonder what's on your mind!
What the hell is a 59 year old even doing on Snapchat?
Edit: rhetorical question
Imagine having that vile critter going down on yer knob - yuck.
They are copying the DM ha ha.The Sun actually told everyone that the guy lived in a 350k house. Wow how is that relevant reporting.