if his show hadn't been cancelled we wouldn't all have so much time to post on here.Sod Hopkins.
Who we truly need...is Jeremy Kyl(i)e!!
if his show hadn't been cancelled we wouldn't all have so much time to post on here.Sod Hopkins.
Who we truly need...is Jeremy Kyl(i)e!!
She didnāt want the girls being left out I think, so to keep it āfairā sheās giving it her surname.But Rachel is married too. They should surely both have Josh's name or atleast changed Josh's name to hers? I just see it as a unity.
Not to mention the kindly donated pot of 'instantly accessible' fundsThere was a twitter request from Trevi for a double bed base for a Service user... They got one donated in the end. You'd think this and stuff like it is something Putwum could do regularly with all those guns and donations. Not hard to keep accounts...
It was Joshās idea apparently. They did a story about it ages ago. She said she didnāt take his name when she married being something to do with not having the same name as any of her kids , and if she took his name sheād be the same as the boys but not the girls. Keeping her own name meant she stayed different to them all. Someone asked if Josh was annoyed about it and then they put another story up where he said a name is just a name and that heād suggested that the baby took her name so thatās what they were going to do. Personally Iād have gone for Marshall, lots less vowels to confuse a child (not counting the ones sheās voluntarily added ha!)That must piss Josh off.
Oh come on. Thereās a massive difference between actually getting drunk around a kid that has trauma surrounding alcohol, and having a bottle of champagne beside you on a special occasions while also announcing a pregnancy.Second photo was from around Christmas time, possibly even Christmas Day, again I took a screenshot but Iām actually not going to share it for the same reasons as above (itās all available on her account if anyone wants to see. So, itās a photo of the 7 of them and says happy Christmas from the 7 of us and new baby due August. Now I saw this photo at the time but it was a while before I read the book so didnāt think anything of it. I, like many people, assumed that if the boys didnāt see their mum there was a good reason for it which I now know is not true. But also in the book Rachel states that they do not drink around Seb because he cannot cope with adults drinking around him due to the trauma of his childhood (Iām paraphrasing). And in this photo from Christmas, thereās Josh sat on the sofa with ALL the kids and a bottle of champagne. So more lies then.
She didnāt want the girls being left out I think, so to keep it āfairā sheās giving it her surname.
What have I missed? What poll?!?I love that poll well done whoever thought of it.
Anyone else excited for Messiah Kaetos next igtv?
I think the same!I've 100% come to the conclusion in her head shes done absolutely nothing wrong and she gives zero shits about it.
What have I missed? What poll?!?
I've 100% come to the conclusion in her head shes done absolutely nothing wrong and she gives zero shits about it.
This is probably more of why she's done it.And obviously if they split up. He wonāt be allowed to see this child because heās ātoxicā the same as all of her other exes.
I think that was me. The impression I got from the book (which I no longer have on my kindle so canāt check to re-read) is that one of the boys in particular is basically traumatised about adults drinking and therefore they donāt drink around him. It may be that only one does at a time but if that is the case, why make an issue of it when I would expect that is what most parents do anyway? It seemed an unfair thing to highlight when the other people involved (Seb, Isaac and Samantha) are not in any position to give their version of events for one reason or another.Yes but someone thought that R stated neither of them drink in front of the boys but were mistaken itās one drinks and one doesnāt.
Once again, sheās full of tit.I think that was me. The impression I got from the book (which I no longer have on my kindle so canāt check to re-read) is that one of the boys in particular is basically traumatised about adults drinking and therefore they donāt drink around him. It may be that only one does at a time but if that is the case, why make an issue of it when I would expect that is what most parents do anyway? It seemed an unfair thing to highlight when the other people involved (Seb, Isaac and Samantha) are not in any position to give their version of events for one reason or another.
If a child is that traumatised, why drink at all around them? And why are the same parents allowing Betsy to drink at 14? All just seems very inconsistent and unlikely.
My husband doesnāt drink anymore due to strong pain so yes I would have the odd drink of we went out for a meal. We wouldnāt both drink at the same time if weāre responsible for the children in case theyāre poorly and need looking after or need to be driven somewhere in an emergency. Admittedly, I have terrible anxiety and probbaly overthink it all too much but if my husband was drinking and the kids were at home with us, I wouldn't drink.So you and your partner don't have one glass of whatever you fancy when you go out for a meal with the kids for instance?
Oh gawd, that link sends you to a forum where I posted a question. Be kind if you read it!There's been a couple of posts about wanting to create a sticky with advice and help contacts. Rather than that it might be a good idea to create a thread in health and advice that people can refer to https://tattle.life/forums/health-advice.13/
The way she made it sound in her book, like they couldnāt drink around him at all, was clearly not true, thatās all Iām saying. And I wouldnāt have thought anything of the photo if SHE hadnāt stated that thatās how things were. Iām not judging anyone who has the odd drink around their kids, but if itās a case of only one of them drinks around him at a time then I would have thought that is pretty standard behaviour for parents of young children and not something that needed writing about in a āSunday Times Bestsellerā.It was Joshās idea apparently. They did a story about it ages ago. She said she didnāt take his name when she married being something to do with not having the same name as any of her kids , and if she took his name sheād be the same as the boys but not the girls. Keeping her own name meant she stayed different to them all. Someone asked if Josh was annoyed about it and then they put another story up where he said a name is just a name and that heād suggested that the baby took her name so thatās what they were going to do. Personally Iād have gone for Marshall, lots less vowels to confuse a child (not counting the ones sheās voluntarily added ha!)
Oh come on. Thereās a massive difference between actually getting drunk around a kid that has trauma surrounding alcohol, and having a bottle of champagne beside you on a special occasions while also announcing a pregnancy.
We donāt drink around my eldest daughter due to what her dad put us through. Meaning we donāt sit in the house and drink in front of the tv or in the kitchen round the table etc, we donāt get our mates round and get pissed on Saturday nite, we donāt have boozy barbecues in the Summer with her there. We have a couple of glasses when there is something to celebrate, or we have people round for dinner then there will be a bottle of wine on the table. My daughter knows that when the dinner is over, the drinking stops.
Iv also noticed that when she posts the āhilariousā videos of Josh drunk, Seb is never there
I think sheās putting it on so that when the tit hits the fan, her āarmyā will fall for her āoh but I didnāt know what I was doing, I canāt understand PayPalā bullshit excuses.Is R really that thick or does she put it on? You canāt be that dim surely? Sorry, was just watching her stories about the kids pasta (obviously Josh is making her a steak ) and I just canāt work out if she acts blonde or really is horrifically thick. (No offence to blonde people btw).