They really would be, she might think of all the women in refuge when she saw letting her child use them willy nilly!
They really would be, she might think of all the women in refuge when she saw letting her child use them willy nilly!Yes she is
Wipes that would be greatly received by a food bank or refuge tbh.
It probably means the words PayPal, scam, stealing, thieving little con woman aren’t allowedJust went to look at the comments on the Lidl wipes post and it says they’ve been limited. Why would that be the case then...?
She really will do anything for money! For the love of god, what are her children going to do when god forbid there isn’t phone shoved in their face 24/7? She treats them like performing monkeyscan’t believe she’s selling her 3 youngest kids to advertise baby wipes
So it's going to sound like I'm defending her but I'm honestly not. Just trying to give my experience of things over.
She may have seen the lady's files from being in care. If you have been in care, once you turn 18 you can ask to receive a copy of your file which will contain everything that's ever been written about you. That's why professionals have to be so careful about how you write about people as they can request to see what's written about them every time. Diplomatic writing is a huge skill we all have to have!
Some people also use these files as a sort of badge of honour, I worked with people who literally thrust their care file at me as I walk in the door, some people use it as an excuse for being "how they are". E.g I was in care which is why I've done x y and z....if you get what I mean.
Safeguarding training is a weird one. I work with high level complex child protection cases, I've got a level 3 in safeguarding however all I had to do to get that was sit in a room all day and listen to someone speak. No tests, no showing that I understand safeguarding practice. Each LA (local authority) is different and depending on your role with young people and adults depends on what level you have to do.
I would have thought she would have had basic training at the least and that would definitely say sharing info on SM is a no no.
Even though my fb is private I could never post something even anonymised about a case I was working on. I'd be fired in seconds.
What I can't get over is how there is nothing that can be done about the PayPal money. She isn't a charity, it isn't fraud....either she's very clever or she lucked out by describing what the money would be going to by accident.
I'd love someone to post on her page something about people donating directly meaning charities would get 25% more through gift aid. Not making it anything to do with her but how it would benefit charities.
What was the comment you liked?I've been blocked! For liking a comment someone put on.
Jesus just come clean about the donations Rachel, it would be easier than constantly having to block everyone
It depends if she is working with domestic abuse etc. We have very different safeguarding in place - and training etc which she wouldn’t have done, it’s evident because of her stories and how she behaves.So it's going to sound like I'm defending her but I'm honestly not. Just trying to give my experience of things over.
She may have seen the lady's files from being in care. If you have been in care, once you turn 18 you can ask to receive a copy of your file which will contain everything that's ever been written about you. That's why professionals have to be so careful about how you write about people as they can request to see what's written about them every time. Diplomatic writing is a huge skill we all have to have!
Some people also use these files as a sort of badge of honour, I worked with people who literally thrust their care file at me as I walk in the door, some people use it as an excuse for being "how they are". E.g I was in care which is why I've done x y and z....if you get what I mean.
Safeguarding training is a weird one. I work with high level complex child protection cases, I've got a level 3 in safeguarding however all I had to do to get that was sit in a room all day and listen to someone speak. No tests, no showing that I understand safeguarding practice. Each LA (local authority) is different and depending on your role with young people and adults depends on what level you have to do.
I would have thought she would have had basic training at the least and that would definitely say sharing info on SM is a no no.
Even though my fb is private I could never post something even anonymised about a case I was working on. I'd be fired in seconds.
What I can't get over is how there is nothing that can be done about the PayPal money. She isn't a charity, it isn't fraud....either she's very clever or she lucked out by describing what the money would be going to by accident.
I'd love someone to post on her page something about people donating directly meaning charities would get 25% more through gift aid. Not making it anything to do with her but how it would benefit charities.
One that Kate I think put on on her InstagramWhat was the comment you liked?
Two comments are stating how bad wipes are for the environment and one is stating that Lidl one’s are like sandpaperJust went to look at the comments on the Lidl wipes post and it says they’ve been limited. Why would that be the case then...?
She is gonna have no one left at the rate she's goingOne that Kate I think put on on her Instagram
Facebook sorry
Yeah me too!And I was blocked by josh last week for liking a comment on Instagram
I don’t think comments on adverts should be deleted or limited. It’s for the benefit of the brand and her funds at the expense of her poor followers. If you are paid to review something, you are supposed to give an HONEST, balanced review, not just say they’re great because you want the money and don’t want to piss off the brand. Again, vulnerable followers are getting a skewed view and will be buying these regardless of whether they are best for their babiesTwo comments are stating how bad wipes are for the environment and one is stating that Lidl one’s are like sandpaper
Comments very quickly limited I bet before someone points she could’ve bought her own wipes with her PayPal fund and donated the Lidl to a refuge along with some of the mammoth stash of Lidl nappies that she was given.
Ones not even herscan’t believe she’s selling her 3 youngest kids to advertise baby wipes
I personally am not a massive fan of he baby wipes, they’re a bit squeaky and scratchy!Two comments are stating how bad wipes are for the environment and one is stating that Lidl one’s are like sandpaper
Comments very quickly limited I bet before someone points she could’ve bought her own wipes with her PayPal fund and donated the Lidl to a refuge along with some of the mammoth stash of Lidl nappies that she was given.
Hi.What I can't get over is how there is nothing that can be done about the PayPal money. She isn't a charity, it isn't fraud....either she's very clever or she lucked out by describing what the money would be going to by accident.
I'd love someone to post on her page something about people donating directly meaning charities would get 25% more through gift aid. Not making it anything to do with her but how it would benefit charities.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?