Yes it’s from today, it’s also on Instagram stories. It’s an irrelevance in the quest for truth, she’s just clutching at straws to make her followers continue to think the sun shines out of her backside. How can they believe she is selflessness personified when she flaunts her wealth to all and sundry then asks her followers to donate items and money to others in need? How many people could the cost of those two pairs of shorts alone helped? I know it’s not our business how much she spends on her kids but it makes me feel uncomfortable to see them in their nice house with their six kids, designer brands everywhere, decent car etc and then begging for help from the same account. It’s like when celebrities (some of whom are millionaires) go on Children In Need begging ordinary folk to donate money to the cause. Makes me feel sick, the whole business. By all means buy your kids what you like and upload whatever content you want but maybe have a closed private account for personal friends where you can flaunt whatever wealth you like?I have no issue with how other people dress their children however ott that seems to me, i wouldn't do it but each to their own if you want to pay £34 for a pair of kids shorts you must have more money than sense! the problem arises when there's a discrepancy over funds, we know about the tshirts, we know about the £1 per book sold goes to women's Aid.
Is the twitter screenshot from today?
I think this just adds to the question really? I have no doubt that R has helped womens aid, with the ptwm 'endorsements' but that has zero to do with the paypal funds.
Rant over