I don’t think you should keep quiet but only if I can reserve the right to say you’re stance is odd/ curious. That’s life huh.So because I don’t agree I must keep quiet. Says it all really. Please read what I wrote above, i think a healthy debate is good, key to an evolving and changing society.
I am a woman too and I am allowed an opinion on this, it is not in bad taste at all.
Some people are accepted back because they are more bankable. The public at large are mostly very forgiving (apart from anything overtly involving multiple victims/death) as they see their own flaws and weaknesses reflected in these ‘stars’ - they are not infallible. It always helps if people appear more relatable and that their audience could legitimately replicate their successes. Sobs stories are still huge for some reason...I know someone who uses them.Somebody else said earlier in the thread but this really boils down to being a criminal or a creep.
We've had a similiar situation in Scotland where former First Minister Alex Salmond was accused of impropriety. He was found not guilty/not proven on all charges. But there's no point in kidding, he's a creep and prone to being too handsy.
I haven't read all of the allegations against Noel Clarke but it seems that the women making the statements don't want to involve the police - why would they given the low rate of criminal convictions.
But that leaves Noel Clarke in a difficult position. No convictions but his career is in the toilet.
Constrast this with Boy George - convicted of false imprisonment and he gets a gig on Prime time Saturday night BBC TV.
Or Ant McPartlan. I'm not suggesting that drunk driving is the same as sexual assault. But you have to wonder how many times he'd been drunk behind the wheel before he crashed.
All of Noel Clarke's problems are of his own making.
But it's funny how some people get accepted back and some people never are.
Last edited: