Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Treesy19

VIP Member
I think if you see a body floating in the river you’d call the police regardless what outfit they’re wearing.
Obviously 🙄. I’m open to all possibilities purely because women go missing and other people are responsible - and thus that includes nothing to do with the river and elsewhere. Hence why what she’s wearing would be very relevant for further sightings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Gloria Rostron

VIP Member
It said the harness was found between the bench and the river, possibly dropped it as she went in ?

we don’t know what goes through peoples minds just before they end their life.
View attachment 1936222
Interesting video. I wonder why we aren't hearing about the other people in the conference call. What could they hear from Nikki's end?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1

SC1990

VIP Member
If she fell into the water surely there would be footprints or skids where she fell? And the dog was bone dry, spaniels are fiercely loyal, he would have went in after her
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Gloria Rostron

VIP Member
Perhaps but do you really think the police haven’t yet spoken to these people? They’re the ones who were literally on the phone to her when she went missing, they have obviously already covered this.
Information on what the police have actually looked in to is ambiguous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Gloria Rostron

VIP Member
No but the Nicola’s phone, the harness and Willow were near to the bench. So either Nicola was nearby, or someone else put them there, it’s why I asked about how near that camera would’ve been to the bench.
I wonder if they were put there as a red herring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Jwren

VIP Member
Ok




you can’t assess it, but you can notice if subconscious body language doesn’t match up with what they are saying. Also I’m sure the husband has spoken more than once. As I said I’m happy to be proved wrong by proof in any other direction. Im sure the police have also stated that they don’t have evidence that she went into the river, but it’s probable, based on the location of her phone etc. if they had any firm evidence that she had gone into the river I’m sure they would concentrate all their efforts on that and not still be open to other options as they’ve stated they are.
The BBC link you’ve posted isn’t as recent as the link I added that you dismissed. Where did you see the interview, as perhaps one of us could pull it up. It would be interesting to see and maybe get a different perspective on it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1

InTheDollsHouse

VIP Member
Didn't her sister say her BF was at home and there is cctv footage so police ruled him out?
Yes, that’s in the post the friend has shared on FB too.

Edit - linking back to post showing the FB post
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Libbub

VIP Member
Anyone can ask whatever they want but I think people were genuinely trying to be helpful by recommending they read up on the case or read the whole thread(s) so we don’t go over the same ground a million more times.
But there's only the same ground to go over.
 
  • Heart
Reactions: 1

Gloria Rostron

VIP Member
From your recent comments about her partner I assumed you thought he was involved in some way. If that’s the case wouldn’t Nicola have had texts (perhaps even way back), saying how unhappy, or even scared she was to friends/colleagues, or even arguments with her partner that would raise alarm bells? And if he were involved in some way I’m not sure he’d want to risk her phone being found.
What I have heard about controlling abusive relationships is the partner checking their phone. I can imagine an abuse victim only discussing their concerns aurally, so as not to leave any evidence that the partner could find. Similarly domestice abuse websites have quick 'escape buttons' for people to click to get off the site in case the partner walks in and sees. Some abuse victims are very good at hiding evidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

MANDATORY

VIP Member
They would need evidence to support the need for a warrant they can’t just say right we’ll search that house. Some people do offer to have their homes and gardens etc searched to look for any signs that the missing person may have been there at some point but this requires the property owners permission and they are within their rights to refuse it if it’s their private property.
After 8 days though surely a warrant has been issued and used if they aren't complaint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Renegadedancer

VIP Member
So they are now looking for another potential witness , a lady pushing a pram. You would think that anyone that was anywhere near that area and saw something remotely out of the ordinary would have already been on touch with the police. I wonder at what stage they will scale down the search if no new evidence comes to light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1

Jwren

VIP Member
How devastating that there was a camera that could have seen everything if it had been working.
Was the caravan park near to the bench do we know? Otherwise I’m not sure how it could have seen everything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1