Well, that escalated quickly...
Or they’re aiming it at this who may have taken her and are reiterating what they’ve taken away?I ran over it last thread but the family have a big focus on how she’s a “mummy” to the girls (and then the dog in the C5 interview). If you take it that they genuinely think she walked off and staged her own disappearance, the emotive language has a bit of a guilt trip/encouragement purpose to it directly aimed at Nicola
Very well deserved! Awesome work xI rewarded myself with a takeaway which arrived 5 mins after I posted it!
none of us know!I’ll leave it to you think how that could’ve easily been manoeuvred, ie are there cameras on every exit of his house?
someone even said ‘this looks like an old man Looking at her’ id love to have vision this good that they can see an old manView attachment 1955258
On Nicolas page someone has commented that this in the background of her picture is ‘a person with their foot up on the bench’ sorry but I’ve never laughed so much…they even did a drawing View attachment 1955261
Oh this is the best thing on the threadView attachment 1955258
On Nicolas page someone has commented that this in the background of her picture is ‘a person with their foot up on the bench’ sorry but I’ve never laughed so much…they even did a drawing View attachment 1955261
The family isn’t in an agreement with the police that she’s in the river and seem to go between suggesting that a third party is involved or that she willingly disappeared herself. I don’t think the police have told them to do much but sit and wait tbh, but since they’re not in agreement they can’t do thatI found it weird the police got the family to do an appeal-if they really think she accidentally drowned what can the public do? The police were already scouring the river,
People pointed out rightly that they never address anyone but Nicola. Could be that they have been told directly by the police not to and so don’t want to lose cooperation. It’s hard to say because again they flip flop between suggesting that someone did something to saying she’s alive and well and just walked outOr they’re aiming it at this who may have taken her and are reiterating what they’ve taken away?
I’ve not even heard of this. There’s a lot of click bait articles in the press about vehicles, maybe it’s a similar thing??Sorry if this has been discussed but has there been any more info regarding the 2 strange men seen at the local church on that morning?
That morning being slightly different and the fact that Nicola seemed very organised, stood out to alot of people. Was she organised because she had a plan to leave and needed everything to go smoothly and run on time, who knows. It seemed like Paul didn't really feel anything was off about it, he said it was a normal morning, he would normally put Willow in the car but Nicola had already done it. I personally don't find anything sinister about it but I can see why some people honed in on that.But they did have a routine for it, he explained what usually happens in the mornings (ie they take it in turns where one loads car and other takes kids/dog) so if something changed that morning it could be significant. Isn't that the whole point of a routine? It's something you do everyday. If it changed for some reason, why? There could be a million reasons, but surely Paul would know and give the reason. If they take it in turns why? Does it go by days or what? Did someone lying in wait for her know she always takes the dog on a Friday? I just think it needs clearing up. I still don't know how often she took the dog but I'm scared to ask because it seems like it must've been asked a million times like the wet dog question!
The Police are scouring cctv, door bell camera and dash cams for sightings of Nicola.I’ll leave it to you think how that could’ve easily been manoeuvred, ie are there cameras on every exit of his house?
This was updated yesterday xI’ve not even heard of this. There’s a lot of click bait articles in the press about vehicles, maybe it’s a similar thing??
have you got a link?
Oh look, it's Kim Kardashian!View attachment 1955258
On Nicolas page someone has commented that this in the background of her picture is ‘a person with their foot up on the bench’ sorry but I’ve never laughed so much…they even did a drawing View attachment 1955261
(there was meant to be a TikTok here about one of those if I go missing binders but unfortunately it’s too long. Basically some women seem to enjoy the idea that they could be victims of a violent crime)Genuinely think people would subconsciously prefer third party involvement. For two reasons 1) ghoulish as it is, a third party being involved is more interesting than the more likely alternative, and in the age of social media, tabloid gossip and true crime people get a thrill out of it though I'm sure that would be denied by many and (2) it is really terrifying to think that an accident like that could happen to you out of the blue. So suspicion of a third party removes that a bit further from the plane of most people's ideas of their daily lives and loved ones - ie, that would never happen to them because their partner isn't "dodgy".
They said in the police press conference that the National Crime Agency had been through everything and agreed with the investigation direction thus far,Because the police wouldn’t not give us their working hypothesis on Nicola's disappearance if they weren’t very sure.
Paul is going to be the first person ruled out of being involved in her disappearance.
Imagine how much trouble Lancs Police will be in if it turns out Nicola has been abducted or murdered by Paul. The police encouraged the Philpotts and others in front of the press because they suspected them, and at that point did not announce anything else. They set a trap, but Lancs Police have told us what they think happened to Nicola and not to speculate about Paul.
You could be absolutely correct, but I disagree and I think Lancs Police would be in a shitload of trouble if they’d got this so wrong. Remember everything they do is being checked .
One of those two men were also seen the same morning of the disappearanceThe things quoting locals apparently giving evidence to the police.. the red van and the 2 suspicious men THE DAY BEFORE SHE WENT MISSING are just people giving info to papers. Not evidence. The police specifically have NOT asked people to look out for these.
It's a locked room mystery. Outdoors.I think this is part of the reason it also gained so much attention. Sure she just vanished but there’s plenty of other people that go missing without much of a trace and they never get picked up by the news. Here we have a whole dog and a river and an exit to focus on = entertainment for the true crime crowds
No it shows he did not leave via the front door!What? The doorbell camera footage does show that he did not leave the house.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?