But it’s the perfect cover because the police aren’t realistically looking anywhere else. So he looks innocent. Idk thinking aloud here….
But it’s the perfect cover because the police aren’t realistically looking anywhere else. So he looks innocent. Idk thinking aloud here….Surely if the husband was involved somehow he’d be pushing the ‘fallen in the river’ story whereas he’s saying he doesn’t believe she’s in there.
I still don’t think he can be cleared as a suspect without being named as a suspect, and he can’t be named as a suspect without there being a crime investigation.A lot of people seem to think the husband is dodgy, but if it has been established that he isn’t a suspect, he has a solid alibi backed up by CCTV, then what part do people think that he played in her disappearance? That he paid someone else to do it?
And me... 100%100% this! Totally agree with you.
Yes you’re right - Nicola was last seen in the upper field. Then her phone and the dog were found at the bench.I am so sorry if this has been asked earlier - I have missed out a few pages so could have missed it. Please don’t should shout at me:
I’m just watching the programme now and until now I’d thought that the sighting was from a person on the upper field who saw Nicola walking along the river path. But they phrased it as if Nicola was actually IN the upper field as they then said that the phone records show that the phone was then back by the river in the vicinity of the bench. If I have understood that correctly, doesn’t that mean that something could have happened in the fields and the phone has been planted back there?
Seriously folks are counting the lines on his face now?!There's a dark mark under one eye and some people have speculated it's a botox bruise but others have pointed out it's visible in some of the photos Nicola has on her Facebook. It's likely it's a birthmark or pigmentation.
Paul might have had botox in the past. They both obviously take care of themselves, but he has 11 lines currently and they'd normally be the first thing you'd tackle with botox.
Maybe but I'm leaning towards no cause the police essentially refused comment on the programme and made a generic 'we're still looking' statement. That doesn't mean they didn't obviously but it all seemed a bit sensationalised for police involvement. It came across to me like the police want nothing to do with any of thisSorry if this has already been mentioned.
I was convinced she’s gone into the water until the interview with C5.
Looking back at history, Karen Matthews, Ian Huntley, Mick Philpott. All did television interviews proclaiming their innocence.
Do you think the police had some responsibility in setting this up to profile the husband’s body language?
Two weeks and still not found, water been checked extensively. Are the police now looking at other avenues?
Thank you - needed to make sure that I’d understood correctly.Yes you’re right - Nicola was last seen in the upper field. Then her phone and the dog were found at the bench.
View attachment 1951608
Yes, especially as the upper field is near where the broken CCTV is, and near the main A road where the friends were yesterday doing the dashcam appeal.Thank you - needed to make sure that I’d understood correctly.
So the fields are very open but lined with trees and bushes. At a push, she could have been abducted or incapacitated there and taken.
lol I didn't think this thread could get anymore batshit.My rational brain says it’s just a tragic accident and she fell in the river
My totally irrational conspiracy side of the brain is saying Paul and Emma have bumped her off and it wasn’t actually Nicola the witnesses saw it was Emma dressed as Nicola as a decoy
And part of me thinks she’s left of her own accord and is hiding somewhere
He definitely hasn’tI thought the same, he’s definitely had it done within the last week.
I don’t think Huntley did a public interview proclaiming he was innocent, I just thought he said he’d seen them that day and they seemed happy etc but I could be wrong.Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
I was convinced she’s gone into the water until the interview with C5.
Looking back at history, Karen Matthews, Ian Huntley, Mick Philpott. All did television interviews proclaiming their innocence.
Do you think the police had some responsibility in setting this up to profile the husband’s body language?
Two weeks and still not found, water been checked extensively. Are the police now looking at other avenues?
No, 11 lines are the name for the two vertical frown lines that appear between the eyesSeriously folks are counting the lines on his face now?!
No, I believe his just related to knowing the girls but he made the mistake of talking about them in the past tense (correct me if I’m wrong)I don’t think Huntley did a public interview claiming he was innocent but I could be wrong.
There would be evidence of blood if that had happened .Does anyone know if there are seesaws in the top field?
I'm going with she was attacked by someone very close to her - blunt force trauma resulting in death.
I mean the two frown lines above his nose that look like a number 11. When you get botox those tend to be the first area you'd target.So you mean 11 lines on his face?
That is correct. The news interviewed him because he was at that stage of them being missing the 'last person to see them alive', obviously at that time nobody bar the police had suspicions that he had done it.I don’t think Huntley did a public interview proclaiming he was innocent, I just thought he said he’d seem them that day and they seemed happy etc but I could be wrong.
Im still churning over that interview out of sheer frustration and that marriage question frankly the stupidity of it and the wasted time.The marriage thing was odd and particularly cruel on channel 5s part.
Internal bleeding? Or knocking her unconscious and moving her?There would be evidence of blood if that had happened .
There is no blood in the area.
Someone said on the last thread an “expert” said they had an abusive relationship. Can’t remember who to quote.I’m on the fence as to whether her partner is involved but I don’t get a nice vibe from him. That doesn’t mean he’s involved but might mean that their relationship was not good or perhaps he’s abusive. Obviously I am speculating based on what I’ve seen but something about him doesn’t sit right. That doesn’t mean he’s bumped her off though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?