Nadia Sawalha #59 Vlogmas 22: Hardly cinematic & v melodramatic; mostly 24 days lugging crap to the attic

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Just saw there live about Emily Attacks programme tonight.. they were livid.. and def talking to Julia thru the screen.. kikis underage posting sexual tiktoks… what if some pedalo followed her?? Its not hard to know her arts school..
My daughter wouldn’t post these.. all on public to.. no class the lot of them
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 16
Dirty Dina just loves it when manky comes out with all his smutty comments. The way she looks at him makes me want to throw up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
I'm furious!!!

Despite it upping their viewing figures I urge you all to watch the Sawalha-Adderleys review of the Emily Atack documentary so we can all discuss their reaction...

Their review was a cross between slagging off Julia, because she dared be concerned about their childrens sexualised behaviour online, and complete justification for their children's sexualised behaviour online.

In my humble opinion adults can behave however they wish (within the law) because they should understand that actions can have consequences and are entitled to dress and behave however they so wish...

They barely had the discussion about the main topic, they focused on their anger at people calling out their girls who when one was 11 and one was 14 were both teasing their 10k followers by provoking them with heinous videos of semi naked children doing everything children should not be doing.

Children, say an 11 Yr old who legally should not even be allowed on Instagram but who had 10k followers, certainly does not have the ability to understand consequences and should be safeguarded and stopped from behaving provocatively online!

The dictionary definition of Provocation is... "the action of arousing sexual desire or interest, deliberately"

The Sawalha-Adderleys CHILDREN have been on line behaving very provocatively for years! Hence why many people have called them out.

Mark calls it "Self expression" but thinks its acceptable that his children should be provocative online...

Mark Adderley also says "Rape is not an entry level offence"
He rants, that there is lots of evidence before it gets to that, stage, ie, flashing in an indicator of what's to come etc...

Excuse my memory tattlers but what was it Mark Adderley did to his friends mother when he was younger? 🤔

So much to discuss, the Sawalha-Adderleys review wasn't about the actual documentary, it was their rant at everyone who has called out their children from acting provocatively online, something that's completely different from Emily Atack, a grown adult, and the abuse she gets online.

I will ALWAYS call out children who are allowed to act provocatively online, children are precious, childhood is precious. When your role model is nadia sawalha, a women who strips off for kicks and attention, it is no wonder their 11 year old daughter was provocatively pouting, touching herself and trying hard to arouse anyone who was watching as it, was, behaviour she learned at home!!!

The Sawalha-Adderleys have over exposed their children on their tit show, let the world know where they live as they took no safety precautions before broadcasting their children to the world. They have led by the worst possible example, they failed to educate their children properly. Their father gleefully admitted sexually assaulting his friends mother, they condone their children stripping off, pouting, wearing sexualised clothes and desperately trying to arouse their followers all in the name of self expression!!! Wankers! Absolute useless sodding Wankers! 😡

Your children, that's BOTH OF YOUR BLOODY CHILDREN, wouldn't be in therapy if you'd provided them with a normal childhood you despicable tw*ts... I don't know how thry dare rant about men lusting after women when thry have not only failed their own children but encouraged them/pimped them out to behave so sexually online! 😡
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 25
*Sigh* Full disclaimer I haven't seen the doc until someone decides to put it up on YouTube. I'm not very familiar with Emily's work or persona; she is one of those people I know by name, but couldn't pick out of a line-up. Just for curiosity's sake I perused her Insta. She is a lovely looking woman with various photos of being casual, out on the town, etc. She has an ample bosom, but I wouldn't say any of her pics are vulgar. She has that classic 1950s body that you can't cover too much or you just look frumpy. The fact that she gets abuse and unsolicited dick pics from randos on the Internet is disgusting.

These two. If you are not a middle aged dude, they are not after you. You are bang on @notSUBmissive that this was an opportunity to get on their high horse and rant. Nadia is in full blown "It's our bodies we can do what we want" rage. Yes we can Nadia because we don't live in a totalitarian regime in the West, I mean tell me something I don't know. :rolleyes: The thing is, social media is a cesspool and the legal system is stuck in 1990s with dial-up. Mark says he liked that Emily said people tell her to stay off social media, "a very trite and easy thing that family members have once said" waving his arm and finger about. 😒 Well it is true, you don't have to be on social media. TPTB are busy trolling for your information and skew what posts/videos get fed to you. Why the hell YouTube managed to get Nadia on my radar I don't know, but here I am. "It's like saying to youngsters don't cross a road." What? Good God is he dense.

Nadia identified with Emily's ideas around shame and if she asked for it. Talks about the way young women dress and how to not make them feel like they are doing something wrong or something, I dunno. Nadia focus on the topic, we are talking about the Internet, not real life. Some beardy guy on the programme mentioned that not all men are gagging for it and Nadia says well maybe it's the men who aren't gagging for it are the ones sending pics and harrassing to feed into toxic masculinity!?! I feel like I am losing brain cells watching this shite. Nadia, they are doing this because they see a pretty woman, living her best life and want to knock her down a peg. She represents to them the popular girl who wouldn't give them a second glance, the girl who dumped them, etc., etc. It has nothing to do with sex drive, IT'S CALLED TRANSFERENCE, LOOK IT UP NADIA! Nadia then says that there are millions and millions and millions and millons of good men out there.

Jennifer in the chat mentions we don't have to mention the good men, they aren't the problem and well Nadia being on Loose, says she has to say not all men obviously, but if she doesn't she'll get stick for it. Mark mention's Emily's Insta feed and says she had pics where she is looking lovely and "sexy." Talk about a male gaze! she has a shaply figure in a form-fitting (not ill-fitting) dress, she look cute, unlike like some pics that look like something out of a trashy skin mag from the 70s, *ahem* DePop. He says if they post a sexy pic "champion them!" You mean blow smoke up their arse like you do with your girls? Sorry, but a father leaving a "looking good" comment on a skanky photo is not cool. 🤮 LIke, what the duck are you even doing on your kid's social feed anyway? "What sort of people are you going to have follow you? Just don't" says Nadia. Well, if your under 18 child is posting provocative pics, I think you need to have a chat. The Internet is forever you know. Nadia says if you don't like it, follow someone else and Mark chimes in with a "Yeah, don't look at it!" Umm, can I have contradiction thy name is Mark for $200 Alex? "We always SUPPORT OUR DAUGHTERS in whatever choices they want to make, because we want THEM to help change the world, we don't want THEM to change for THE FUCKIN, STINKING WORLD!" What a couple of delusional freaks. Bleugh.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Angry
Reactions: 23
Better/more robust responses to Nadia and Mark’s delusional and defensive discussion of Emily Atack’s documentary are above. I’ll just endorse a few points already made:

- Ms Atack is an adult with the cognitive and legal ability to consent to and control what she posts.

- Ms. Atack occasionally shares a picture of herself in swimwear. As far as I can tell she did not, at the age of 18 and younger, post photos of herself in bed with her partner. She does not repeatedly post photos of herself on a toilet and/or giving the finger to an audience of 18K people, of whom she only knows about 300. She did not post videos of herself at the age of 13 or 17 or 18 - scantily clad and lip syncing to explicit music.

- Two things can be true at the same time: 1) posting a photo or video of oneself as “scantily clad” is not necessarily an invitation to random people to respond with sexually explicit comments (though M&N should ask themselves why that is how their children have chosen to express themselves this way); 2) any responsible donkey of a parent will know that if a child posts such content publicly it will attract horrible comments and dangerous attention, especially if that parent promotes that child’s account and/or allows it to remain public.

- I’ve always found it hypocritical for this couple to repeat to the world and to their children the mantra “those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” Yet they have based their spiritual and economic well being on the number of clicks they get from Instagram and YouTube.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
They are just thick,neglectful, damaging, lazy,deluded, immature failures in even the basics of parenthood who unfortunately have a platform to spout their champagne socialist, self absorbed bullshit and lies on . Meanwhile their half dressed but self expressed household burns down around them.

Why do the very people who really shouldn't be anywhere near the Internet (except for an hour a day catchup) try to make a living shoving their tit bandwagon thoughts, unoriginal ideas and sheep looks onto the world when really it would be better for their mental and physical health and probably wealth to get a " proper job". I don't think it is a healthy way to live.
Mark?

P.s. show strangers your tits, post endless vanity selfies, I really don't care IF you are an adult. But don't come moaning about nasty comments among the nice and crying its in the name of empowerment, while implying every mans a potential rapist. You reap what you sow. Get real.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 19
haven't watched the emily atak doc, or the sawalha adderley commentary. but the one thing I do know is she recently posted a pic of her appearing on celebrity juice with lisa mejuto and nadia's and manks friend leigh francis- a show that comedifies sexual harassment and the making of highly sexual comments to women. A show also produced by dan baldwin (holly willowBOOBIES husband) , who also produced Dapper Laughs on the pull, a show that was quite frankly disgusting and outrightly misogynistic. Here she is pictured for the show dressed in a way such that her tits are out no doubt for comments to be made about by host Leigh Francis.

This was seven weeks ago.




Excuse me if my heart ain't exactly bleeding if she received comments online on social media that she and that show have completely normalised.

I also won't be taking seriously a bunch of unselfaware cohorts of the host, whose livings, and promotion of their social media content have been clearly calculated and have been tied to him.

Did men message you Emily and say that they wanted to "smash your back doors in". Oh dear, poor you.

I am getting bored of actresses and celebrities getting to create these self-justifying pity parties without effective journalistic challenge.

And here is emily have a pity party thrown for her on this morning by dan baldwin's wife Holly willobooby.



She's crying. Always good to see a woman moist isn't it? as dapper laughs would probably joke.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
I also won't be taking seriously a bunch of unselfaware cohorts of the host, whose livings, and promotion of their social media content have been clearly calculated and have been tied to him.
I agree, it's hard to take it seriously as we are ultimately watching someone whose career is being on TV.

Of course, I agree with Emily's underlying message. It's hardly a bold, trailblazing documentary though as the coverage may make you think - it's really a very 'public friendly' topic. Most will agree that harassing women online is wrong. Emily's not some angel doing it for the good of all women, and I'm sure the good PR and interest in herself has been calculated when coming up with this documentary.

At least it makes better TV than the 'The Emily Atack Show'. Don't worry if you haven't heard of it, not many have!

I'm surprised Nadia doesn't take a leaf out of Emily's book and takes a pic in her garden in a bikini while saying it's about 'empowering women' and 'body confidence', which is really a euphemism for 'generating headlines'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
I'm furious!!!

Despite it upping their viewing figures I urge you all to watch the Sawalha-Adderleys review of the Emily Atack documentary so we can all discuss their reaction...

Their review was a cross between slagging off Julia, because she dared be concerned about their childrens sexualised behaviour online, and complete justification for their children's sexualised behaviour online.

In my humble opinion adults can behave however they wish (within the law) because they should understand that actions can have consequences and are entitled to dress and behave however they so wish...

They barely had the discussion about the main topic, they focused on their anger at people calling out their girls who when one was 11 and one was 14 were both teasing their 10k followers by provoking them with heinous videos of semi naked children doing everything children should not be doing.

Children, say an 11 Yr old who legally should not even be allowed on Instagram but who had 10k followers, certainly does not have the ability to understand consequences and should be safeguarded and stopped from behaving provocatively online!

The dictionary definition of Provocation is... "the action of arousing sexual desire or interest, deliberately"

The Sawalha-Adderleys CHILDREN have been on line behaving very provocatively for years! Hence why many people have called them out.

Mark calls it "Self expression" but thinks its acceptable that his children should be provocative online...

Mark Adderley also says "Rape is not an entry level offence"
He rants, that there is lots of evidence before it gets to that, stage, ie, flashing in an indicator of what's to come etc...

Excuse my memory tattlers but what was it Mark Adderley did to his friends mother when he was younger? 🤔

So much to discuss, the Sawalha-Adderleys review wasn't about the actual documentary, it was their rant at everyone who has called out their children from acting provocatively online, something that's completely different from Emily Atack, a grown adult, and the abuse she gets online.

I will ALWAYS call out children who are allowed to act provocatively online, children are precious, childhood is precious. When your role model is nadia sawalha, a women who strips off for kicks and attention, it is no wonder their 11 year old daughter was provocatively pouting, touching herself and trying hard to arouse anyone who was watching as it, was, behaviour she learned at home!!!

The Sawalha-Adderleys have over exposed their children on their tit show, let the world know where they live as they took no safety precautions before broadcasting their children to the world. They have led by the worst possible example, they failed to educate their children properly. Their father gleefully admitted sexually assaulting his friends mother, they condone their children stripping off, pouting, wearing sexualised clothes and desperately trying to arouse their followers all in the name of self expression!!! Wankers! Absolute useless sodding Wankers! 😡

Your children, that's BOTH OF YOUR BLOODY CHILDREN, wouldn't be in therapy if you'd provided them with a normal childhood you despicable tw*ts... I don't know how thry dare rant about men lusting after women when thry have not only failed their own children but encouraged them/pimped them out to behave so sexually online! 😡
This is all absolutely right! And the flashing.. maybe hes daddy? It was so obvious it wasnt about Emily but Julia they were fuming.. Emily was amazing. What Nadia said about her girls changing the world at the end.. cringe !!
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Heart
Reactions: 15
There seems to be a subtle dig at Julia in this description, mentioning the "long story" of how they have so few wedding photographs, which we know Julia didn't allow, as her then boyfriend Alan Davies didn't want pictures of him to be sold to a magazine company.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 13
Just a side comment as I've seen Emily complaining about how women are sexualised from a very young age by men or society BUT no-one ever addresses the now widespread and almost normal sexualisation of girls and women by THEMSELVES to strangers. I'm not a fan of fb or any other sm but I'm always shocked when I see even profile photos are soft porn.
I watched a girl the other day taking endless selfies of herself on her phone. It was freezing but she ended up with her jacket off around her shoulders and her boobs on show in her crop top. It went on for ages with her angling to get her tits in the photo and sucking in her flab. She was 16 at the most. Unfortunately not unusual behaviour.
It's NEVER addressed. It's always mens fault. It's NOT empowering, I don't care if I come across as old-fashioned, it's a about self respect.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 17
They were discussing adult ADHD on GB News this morning and mentioned Johnny Vegas, Heston the chef and Sue Perkins, not a mention of Madam who thought she was the most famous person to have it.
Thought Eamonn would have mentioned it as Ruth is one of her "besties" ;)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10
As parents its your job to do your upmost to keep them safe and teach them to make sensible choices in life. Make them aware of dangers around them. They inevitably will make errors and hopefully learn from them. But these two prefer to be friends instead of parents. They are taught they can do whatever they want and if it goes wrong its not their fault, its everybody else's. She bangs on about how she identifies strongly with her Arabic roots. I'm not sure her extended family back in Jordan would be jubilant to see a drunken Moody on the bog with her knickers down and her boobs hanging out. Even less so with what the child Kiki puts out.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 15
There seems to be a subtle dig at Julia in this description, mentioning the "long story" of how they have so few wedding photographs, which we know Julia didn't allow, as her then boyfriend Alan Davies didn't want pictures of him to be sold to a magazine company.
"We’ve only got four wedding photos ( long story ) .. these are they …😂 "

Ah, bless Nadia Sawalha and her rubbish ADHD lady counting. Here are two more snaps for the collection - ones that Google points out she has posted on her Instagram before. :sneaky:
Wedding 1.jpg


Wedding 2.jpg

Here's hoping she has albums full of pics of her weddings to Justin and Hamza to compensate.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 20
"We’ve only got four wedding photos ( long story ) .. these are they …😂 "

Ah, bless Nadia Sawalha and her rubbish ADHD lady counting. Here are two more snaps for the collection - ones that Google points out she has posted on her Instagram before. :sneaky:
View attachment 1926669

View attachment 1926670
Here's hoping she has albums full of pics of her weddings to Justin and Hamza to compensate.
Has Manky EVER taken those rings off in the past 21 years?
 
  • Sick
  • Like
Reactions: 11
They were discussing adult ADHD on GB News this morning and mentioned Johnny Vegas, Heston the chef and Sue Perkins, not a mention of Madam who thought she was the most famous person to have it.
Thought Eamonn would have mentioned it as Ruth is one of her "besties" ;)
Probably because no one cares, even after Nadia Sawalha Revealed Her Emotional ADHD Diagnosis Story on LW. :sneaky:
Nadia Sawalha Reveals Her Emotional ADHD Diagnosis Story | Loose Women - YouTube

No one cares, as reflected in these abysmal viewings stats for her YouTube 'series' and in Mark Adderley's face. 😂 😂

1675248246707.png
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 11
Her children are going to change the world? They can't even change their own bedsheets!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
Her children are going to change the world? They can't even change their own bedsheets!
Oh Moodie is half way there when it comes to inspirational leadership - remember the matching Sawalha Adderley family tattoos are pending. :sneaky:
Before we know it, all the impressionable submissives will have one. :( Go Moodie!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 14
I don't know what the duck 3rd wave feminism was doing during the late 90s/early 2000s, but they were definitely asleep at the wheel. It was like it went backwards, i.e. ladettes, the resurrection of Playboy bunnies and wearing as little as possible and saying "look I'm just in charge of my sexuality so suck it." I thought we were supposed to go beyond our physical appearance. Couple that with the true narcissism that is taking pics of yourself and then posting them for everyone to see; I don't get it.

Nadia with her weight and not feeling comfortable in her skin, but in an effort to not lumber her girls with that, she has gone the other way. She constantly goes on about how beautiful her daughters are. Give it a rest woman! Can she not see that she can give them another complex, investing everything in their appearance? The youngest was dying her hair and wearing make-up before she was 14!

Misogyny doesn't give a tit whether you are a AA or DDD cup, it doesn't care if you wear a mini or a maxi skirt, baggy or tight jeans, make-up or sans fards, if you are female you are fair game. Do I like it, do I think it is fair? No. Like I said in my previous post, until the law catches up to the 21st century, it's like the wild west on the Internet.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
Anyone catch the live this morning? So many secret notes back and forth until Nitts finally blurts out at 37:56 can we block that one. Anyone know who it was and what they were saying?

If they pronounce Emily Atack‘s name one more time. Why don’t they know it’s ”A” tack and not attack! They watched her only last night, surely they would have heard it being pronounced correctly. I can’t see any difference in her at all on this new ADHD medication. If anything she’s become even more self righteous and unbearable 😡
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 11
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.