Exactly my point, if Hinch is gonna lie at least do it properly. Many of us on this thread have caught her out fibbing, doesn't make her look good.Henc
Hence why jamie is still in bed after he did the night feeds
Exactly my point, if Hinch is gonna lie at least do it properly. Many of us on this thread have caught her out fibbing, doesn't make her look good.Henc
Hence why jamie is still in bed after he did the night feeds
I think most ‘Influencers’ have loads of prerecorded content, it’s their full time job. Soph is just not quite on the ball enough and shows things at the wrong time. The thing that’s different with Hinch is she pretends it’s not,if she was honest and transparent then we would not be here right now.This is the thing, she posts those boomerangs of her ‘hinched’ rooms and honestly they could have been filmed at any time. I really don’t believe she gets up first thing and does all that cleaning, no way! It’s all part of the pretence. Loads of these home accounts just repeat pics of their rooms ‘hinched’, theyre not doing half the cleaning they claim to be!
Where's the cheque for the hospital staff who looked after her and possibly saved her unborn baby due to her self neglect.Wow! What a morning she has had! Made herself the equivalent of a years Nurses salary by spraying and hoovering.
What message does this send to new mums? Get out of bed and ‘find’ housework to do for 3 hours even if there is none to do! Rest when you can,enjoy being with your baby in bed!
If I hoovered for 15 minutes I would have a lot more dust than that!
I can see Jamie walking away from this,she has started to be so nasty in the way she takes the piss out of him.
And the under cupboard lights are on. But according to Sophie, just pointing that out is trolling. As is the case with most social media influencers, its perfectly ok for them to hide hashtags, not disclose working partnerships, recommend products as their absolute 'fave' when they've been paid to recommend them, accept free gifts in lieu of payment for ads but not declare it as income, edit their stories to their own agenda etc. But no, none of that is an issue, talking about it however, yeah, thats trolling.Bollocks....total bollocks! She’s using prerecorded clips that she recycles over and over again. So...2 hours ago she placed this story...would have been 8am .......she would have needed time to film and edit etc so well before 8am she would have filmed it.....so why is her f****** wax melt burner on with the light clearly glowing.....it’s all bollocks.
And I thought it had to be 100k signatures to mean anything or am I adding 90k mistakenly? I’m still learning guysAnd the under cupboard lights are on. But according to Sophie, just pointing that out is trolling. As is the case with most social media influencers, its perfectly ok for them to hide hashtags, not disclose working partnerships, recommend products as their absolute 'fave' when they've been paid to recommend them, accept free gifts in lieu of payment for ads but not declare it as income, edit their stories to their own agenda etc. But no, none of that is an issue, talking about it however, yeah, thats trolling.
I hope they are aware, that opening a debate about online trolling to Parliament and accountability will also bring to the forefront how unregulated and unaccountable social media influencers are, they can't have their cake and eat it, influencers should be held accountable too.
Also, that petition is far too vague. For starters, define trolling. It has no legal definition. But they lump a DM such as 'you're ugly', to be equal with posting a comment saying 'advising your followers to do that is dangerous' when the two are very different scenarios.
Have you seen Stacey's latest post...... she really is vile commenting that she's now finishing her that she didn't get chance to finish earlier. So gross - why would people be interested in that especially as she's sat on the shitter telling us all too.Stacey has been on the ball this morning, she’s now googling ‘decorating on a budget’ how long until grinch is round and helping with the gifted decorating and new furywholst joes away be less predictable girls.
I bought 3 copies!READ ALL ABOUT IT.
I felt sure she would have been inside when I saw the headline,but no
She also didn’t wash it before he wore it? Everything else was washed before he first wore it? You get to the point of not believing anything she posts or says. She is such a duplicitous and manipulative woman.She only bought TWO footless sleep suits?? Ha! I thought she was desperate for them and only got TWO. Hope she’s home tomorrow for the massive *gifted parcel from H&M.
READ ALL ABOUT IT.
I felt sure she would have been inside when I saw the headline,but noView attachment 40432View attachment 40432
I bought 3 copies!
Tbf I thought she said she washed it,but I agree with the restShe also didn’t wash it before he wore it? Everything else was washed before he first wore it? You get to the point of not believing anything she posts or says. She is such a duplicitous and manipulative woman.
Really she made a big announcement about going to H@M with Jamie in their Range Rover but it was raining so she got scared so went to ( get ready for my paid partnership with) McDonald’s and popped into relatable Matalan...but really I want some beautiful gifted smocked sleepsuits costing £50 each to arrive in the next few days!
Apologies, I missed that! My mistake xTbf I thought she said she washed it,but I agree with the rest
More like TIME TO SORT YOUR tit OUTThere's 3 bottles in the sink, really can't believe she left at least 2 in there from night before. If he's slept for 8 hours then why has she left Ronnie in bed with Jamie to sleep again. Really dont believe her. I think SHE slept 10-6 and Jamie did the night feed. Its her way of getting back at him for going gym.View attachment 40401
Laughable that when the shoe is on the other foot and it's her army bombarding anyone that dares to disagree with her, that's okayAnd the under cupboard lights are on. But according to Sophie, just pointing that out is trolling. As is the case with most social media influencers, its perfectly ok for them to hide hashtags, not disclose working partnerships, recommend products as their absolute 'fave' when they've been paid to recommend them, accept free gifts in lieu of payment for ads but not declare it as income, edit their stories to their own agenda etc. But no, none of that is an issue, talking about it however, yeah, thats trolling.
I hope they are aware, that opening a debate about online trolling and accountability to Parliament, will also bring to the forefront how unregulated and unaccountable social media influencers are, they can't have their cake and eat it, influencers should be held accountable too.
Also, that petition is far too vague. For starters, define trolling. It has no legal definition. But they lump a DM such as 'you're ugly', to be equal with posting a comment saying 'advising your followers to do that is dangerous' when the two are very different scenarios.
Just to confirm, I live 10 miles away from maldon and the weather was wonderful all day, it didn't rain at all!
I hope you caught the bit when she said she managed to get the footless ones which luckily come with a pair of socksApologies, I missed that! My mistake x