I reported that photo.won’t show the children’s faces, but will show their naked bod. Why don’t people understand the danger of having these innocent children in such a vulnerable way on social media is NOT ok.
So did I. There is no need to publicly show your children’s naked image online regarding the point she was trying to make. Full stop.I reported that photo.
Oh is that the case? I didn’t realise thatMe too......but don’t forget, she was one of the original child exploiters on Instagram.....she only has her platform now because she let the world know everything about her children and didn’t care about their privacy or online presence
absolutely! She was one of the first instamums...the term was based on her and her friends....dress like a mum, mother of daughters etcOh is that the case? I didn’t realise that
Oh massively, she was heavily heavily present as an instamum when Evie was first born.Oh is that the case? I didn’t realise that
Yup she was. She was the primate as much as she’s changed & harps on about not showing her kids or materialism, that’s exactly how she started & how she got to where she is now - she can only lord it over the others because she did it all before & can now sit back as an activist/writer/radio presenter & not need to shill her kids or privacy. (Although showing the baby’s butt seems a bit against everything she’s said before )Oh massively, she was heavily heavily present as an instamum when Evie was first born.
Not only that. What about the pedophiles on the dark web super imposing that image? Not even worth thinking about. Sickening.I reported that image. Instagram is fine with naked babies it seems. So warped. Evie didn’t need to be in that photo like that - how humiliating for her as she gets older
As far as I can see it’s still there. Instagrams response to my report was that it doesn’t violate their guidelines.Has it been removed?
Not only that. What about the pedophiles on the dark web super imposing that image? Not even worth thinking about. Sickening.
Totally missed this - what happened?Has anyone seen her stories today? Apparently the FT has stolen her idea
Me neither I think she’s really generalising here, all big employers I work with and for are all being incredibly flexible with staff they understand isolation issues with young children etc, staff are working from home and being flexible.I really don't get today's post. Working from home is a form of flexible working isn't it? Or does she want flexible working to be time off when people want, but no dip in salary?