You'd think so, but no they've threatened legal action over removing these threads.I don’t think either would read the content on Tattle and then take note, they have a combined following of millions and they swat the negative comments away with ease.
Legal action? What’s their objection to free speech?You'd think so, but no they've threatened legal action over removing these threads.
He needs to publicly apologise to his daughter, just deleting a few hours later and not acknowledging he was out of order isn't acceptable.
Because Clemmie is the boss and he does what she wants, Simon is her live in Nanny with occasional benefits .....when the mood takes her .Latest post translated 'love is letting Clemmie do whatever she likes with little regard for anyone else'
Too blinded by the horrendous suit.I notice you’ve all missed the £1200 Gucci bag
This. They are so childish and self obsessed. His post this evening is just awful. Love is Clemmie doing whatever Clemmie wants and then when it’s his turn, doing whatever Clemmie wants... the games they play are so sad. So he’ll get to post what he wants because he let her stay out they don’t respect each other and are the fakest real couple. They don’t fancy each other (well she doesn’t fancy him)Can you IMAGINE the fall out if it was FOD who stumbled in the next morning with a full fat coke after 'staying at a friend's' the night before? Jeeeze
What did he do to his daughter?You'd think so, but no they've threatened legal action over removing these threads.
He needs to publicly apologise to his daughter, just deleting a few hours later and not acknowledging he was out of order isn't acceptable.
You can see it on the last few pages of the previous thread, but basically he posted a whatsapp screenshot of a conversation with his eldest where she’s giving him attitude and they’re bickering and he’s trying to ask/tell her to be more polite and she tells him to stop trying to be like an influential speakerWhat did he do to his daughter?
So they want the law to protect them for failing to protect their own children?You'd think so, but no they've threatened legal action over removing these threads.
He needs to publicly apologise to his daughter, just deleting a few hours later and not acknowledging he was out of order isn't acceptable.
Seriously! Have they done that?! So, what they are implying is it’s absolutely ok for them to do what they do, but not ok for anyone to talk about itYou'd think so, but no they've threatened legal action over removing these threads.
St Clemmie of Midwifery and Ramsgate is beyond reproach remember, in her head anywaySeriously! Have they done that?! So, what they are implying is it’s absolutely ok for them to do what they do, but not ok for anyone to talk about it
I guess they managed to shut discussion down on mumsnet, they feel they can.They’ve threatened legal action? Wtf do they think they are?They’ve pimped out their kids and sold every second of their lives to the highest bidder but threaten legal action if anyone dares to comment on it? Absolutely laughable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?