She’s funny ,Her doing her sexy chores!!!
Too right she’s the murkiest of them all; doesn’t declare ads and when she does she tries to disguise it on the screen , she offers very low engagement with her followers and will turn up to the opening of an envelope.She’s the least transparent one! She bleats on about sustainability but has new clothes every single day. She supports small businesses by accepting freebies. The only thing I will say is she’s one of only a few of those insta mums who hasn’t unfollowed MOD.
The funny thing is many of the women promoting this stuff couldn’t afford the lifestyle either of it wasn’t gifted or they didn’t earn money from ads. Zoes hubby hardly Donald trump.Hmm I see your point but for me it came across like she was trying to tick all the boxes to appeal to the instahun critics over the last few days and ensure that her position is safe.
However It might just be me being a bit of a skeptic, because the more I think about this way of marketing the more I disagree with it.
We’re talking about brands using these women to push products to other women (largely new mums) who probably can’t afford this lifestyle they are promoting. We also know that this kind of thing on social media is a huge contributor to the mental health issues we are facing. It just feels wrong on so many levels.
She is awful. Clearly connected in some way hence why she is still gifted loads of stuff. Must have lots of bought followers as she has very low engagement.She’s funny ,
Too right she’s the murkiest of them all; doesn’t declare ads and when she does she tries to disguise it on the screen , she offers very low engagement with her followers and will turn up to the opening of an envelope.
She’s another posh blonde who’ll flog anything, especially if it’s pink , don’t forget the boiler suit Tattlers , the beginning of MoD’s terrible November.
MOST. SENSIBLE. POST. IN. THIS. WHOLE. SHITSHOW.As a person of colour I'm sick of people being offended on my behalf. Clemmie hooper's comments here weren't racist. It's not racist to call someone that happens to be black aggressive. Candice does always bring it back to race as that's her brand, she doesn't care about black issues just what she can use to make money.
Also fod and his "I like black people" post is worse than Clemmie's Candice comment. It's cold, calculated and totally transparent. He's stupider than I ever thought.
Haha! It was more cos CT had her new list up and then I fell into a list reading rabbit holeOooo what made you think to look at that? That’s a lot of stalking I need lessons from you
Ah didn’t see this one! It was the 2016 one called “midwifeyhooper” that’s goneThe Londoner Who Finally Left
The ‘Other Clemmie’ aka @mother_of_daughters was the guinea pig for me, “I’ll see how the Hooper’s get on outside London” and then see if we can follow suit and …motherofalllists.com
Just had a look at her account and my, isn’t she obsessed with herself.Everyone is hopping on the bandwagon - I just screen-shot the first post that popped up this morning and here it is. I think IG is so cringey
I saw it as a big fuck you to anyone saying his wife’s racist - typical crass behaviour off him, I think his wife’s description of him being a twat was mildShe ignored a questioner in her post asking why she hid the #ad of her posts. She also forgets to mention that her husband works for the veg delivery company she mentions. Think it is Riverford.
Her stories tonight asking for small businesses to contact her so she can promote their Christmas products are
Maybe he is trolling his wife with that story. Or just trolling the whole saga.
All these articles are the same, trying to justify themselves. Their self esteem is so low it’s shocked me, as has how angry people get over a few words from a stranger on a tiny screen.Interesting article by Constance Hall in regards to Clemmie Hooper
Constance Hall: "Last year, I set up a fake Facebook account. I named myself Annie."
She only made two posts.www.mamamia.com.au
Thank you for this. It does show a different perspective on it all - but I don’t think it will make any difference to the masses.Interesting article by Constance Hall in regards to Clemmie Hooper
Constance Hall: "Last year, I set up a fake Facebook account. I named myself Annie."
She only made two posts.www.mamamia.com.au
I learned about the swipe ups/affiliate links from the Mrs Hinch threads. If someone doesn’t tell you then how else are you supposed to find out? It’s another example of the sneakiness that is rife on Instagram.No wonder they never tell you the actual price of anything - how many people click just out of curiosity? (Well, for the opportunity to say ‘HOW MUCH?!’)
I thought that if they do an affiliate link to,say,Amazon for a nappy bin, and you click the link but then don't buy it, if you go back onto Amazon in 30 days and buy something completely different then they get 7% of that? I might be wrong...but how do you get 7% of nothing if no purchase is made
Too good.I just watched that video again. Utterly misguided Simon. Tomorrow night’s offering:
“FOD cooks ackee and saltfish #gousto”
The sooner FOD accepts that, whether he likes it or not, his brand includes Clemmie the better. He's desperately trying to dissociate himself from his own wife just for the likes. Its tragic. They built it all as a family and should deal with it as a family. Seems like every post stinks of desperation to be kept out of it when really if he wants to save himself he needs to start helping to save clemmie too if he wants the brand to go on. He doesn't realise how out of touch with reality he is and proves it more with every post.Thank you for this. It does show a different perspective on it all - but I don’t think it will make any difference to the masses.
I’m not sure how SOD will get over this. It looks like brands have pulled from FOD too - as they don’t want to be associated with any of it. Hence the random story and post.
it’s makes you question if they do indeed still have management? You’d think the management would be doing some collateral damage, not just letting it implode like this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?