Something they haven’t revealed is whether he had ever made the journey between Smyi town and Pedi before, regardless of whether by foot, car, bus…if he’s made the journey before (even with other people) it’s very hard to see how he could have possibly got lost. That might be why it’s taken police so long to go down this route of him taking the odd decision to take that dangerous exit in the wrong direction. This whole thing looks like a heat exhaustion or transient amnesia issue or similar causing bad judgment/confusion. If he was thinking logically and felt lost, he could easily have gone into one of the cafes and got help to get back to his accommodation or the police contacted if he couldn’t remember where it was. He was in an easy location to get help when he made that bad decision.
Not sure what to make of the Daily Mail coverage. Are they trying to keep the story a headline to keep pressure on the Greek authorities to help their colleague? Or, are they treating one of their own a clickbait?
The latest article is mostly regurgitation, there was mentioning of his kids arriving and retracing his steps nearly 2 days ago, so why are they naming all 4 of them and claiming they arrived today. Why is a journalist walking part of the trail just to test what it’s like, isn’t that just putting more human scent on it and risking a fall and diverting resources for a rescue? Surely no-one should be on that dangerous area of trail today unless they are in an organised search party working under police guidance. The search party asked the journalist ‘not to speak to them’…possibly those people are Dr Mosley’s children or family taking part as volunteers.
It’s one thing to write articles and do stuff like speculate online…but it’s a whole other ball game to be physically interfering with the search operation or approaching people who are under emotional distress. People are obviously interested in the story, but surely the photos, maps, cctv, local reports are providing all the relevant information…why are British or other journalists travelling out there just to hang around getting in the way? It’s a small area, only one narrow road access to Pedi, the presence of unnecessary people could hinder the search. Are they hoping for a quote from one of the children or something ghoulish like that?
Not sure what to make of the Daily Mail coverage. Are they trying to keep the story a headline to keep pressure on the Greek authorities to help their colleague? Or, are they treating one of their own a clickbait?
The latest article is mostly regurgitation, there was mentioning of his kids arriving and retracing his steps nearly 2 days ago, so why are they naming all 4 of them and claiming they arrived today. Why is a journalist walking part of the trail just to test what it’s like, isn’t that just putting more human scent on it and risking a fall and diverting resources for a rescue? Surely no-one should be on that dangerous area of trail today unless they are in an organised search party working under police guidance. The search party asked the journalist ‘not to speak to them’…possibly those people are Dr Mosley’s children or family taking part as volunteers.
It’s one thing to write articles and do stuff like speculate online…but it’s a whole other ball game to be physically interfering with the search operation or approaching people who are under emotional distress. People are obviously interested in the story, but surely the photos, maps, cctv, local reports are providing all the relevant information…why are British or other journalists travelling out there just to hang around getting in the way? It’s a small area, only one narrow road access to Pedi, the presence of unnecessary people could hinder the search. Are they hoping for a quote from one of the children or something ghoulish like that?