She does know the dry robe isn't a coat right? 
Mere Soeur
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Mere Soeur Threads
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Well he’s a commodity now - why show his face for free when you can get paid to do it?
Yeah but it’s the pretence that she’s not showing him on the daily when in the same run of photos you can see his face??
Came to see if anyone was chatting about this, so glad to see there is! It's madness, covering his face now when everything about his life has been shoved down followers throats for years, they'll be pictures of him with his mum's tit in his gob on the internet for everyone to see forever.....but now she's concerned about his privacy? Ummm 
Good pointBut she HASNT decided to stop selling her kid, she’s only not sharing him when it’s a personal post. She has literally decided to ONLY sell him
Just wanted to add I don't have an issue with breastfeeding or pictures of it at all, only that with hers it seemed an excuse just to give herself a pat on the back, with her smug face posing in lingerie, without any thoughts to Riv and his privacy.
A lot of things she does is in very poor taste. Going on about spending money on therapy for example. I think she’s very tone deaf. She presents as though she’s empowering women but really she just brags about herself constantly. I find her insufferable and can’t believe I used to be a fan the blinkers are well and truly off for me now 
the blinkers are well and truly off for me now She’s banging on again about wanting Riv’s “face as far from the internet as possible”.
He’s the face of a Made advert, you bleeping dimwit.
He’s the face of a Made advert, you bleeping dimwit.
does she not see how stupid it sounds
Didn't mind telling everyone he'd wet the bed the other day though!
Oh don’t! I was mortified. I’m sure when he’s older he’d be more ducked off at her telling thousands of people about his pissy pants than showing his face (when she’s not getting paid).
Not being funny but she’s chirps on about him not sleeping and being awake four times a night but the poor thing isn’t home long enough to get into a routine and get used to his bed/room/house. Granted he sees his dad but he gets tossed around. She might thing she’s Mother Earth but duck me, give the kid a rest.
How is that the internet’s business? Bed wetting is quite common for younger children. She should respect his privacy more. What a disgraceful thing to do.
She’d do better with a more structured routine for him. He’s still very young and needs consistency.
It's mind boggling it truly is! You couldn't make this tit up
Also just realised there's another member called 'Squirrelfriend'
great minds eh, was thinking of changing mine anyway so I'll get on it now to avoid confusion!
Haha I saw that I was totally there first thoughIt's mind boggling it truly is! You couldn't make this tit up
Also just realised there's another member called 'Squirrelfriend'
Carrie seems to take time off from instagram after this thread has been particularly active.
I don't even know how to change it so it'll have to stay for now mate, sorry!Haha I saw that I was totally there first though
Carrie has been quiet I wonder if she knows about or watches this thread
I take that thought back she definitely does, her recent post/stories having a dig at "people who av nowt to do with eny of us" having concerns about her son(sidenote: how do people feel about not using his name in these threads anymore? Just saying her son instead, to protect his privacy?) which as far as I can see haven't been voiced in the comments so either she's getting the dm's which I'm sure she'd love to show receipts of OR she reads here.I don't even know how to change it so it'll have to stay for now mate, sorry!
Carrie has been quiet I wonder if she knows about or watches this thread
People have opinions Carrie, you can't change that! Also I don't personally give a tit if he might/might not settle in his new school but I am laughing at your attempt to protect his privacy
Also she's been awfully quiet on the girlgang aka Kristi Hadley debacle, she's got a lot to say about a lot of stuff but is staying shtum on that front
Last edited:
The thing is, the only person I’ve seen harping on about the lack of her sons face on social media is her. To be fair she could be deleting comments and I can’t see her dms, but it’s almost like she wants people to have an issue with her doing it. No one cares! He’s your son you’re perfectly welcome to give him privacy. And if random followers do care, then surely someone who likes to make themselves out to be as outspoken and unbothered by others opinions as Carrie does wouldn’t give two hoots, not keep explaining again and again.
Not gonna lie though, if you really are protecting his privacy then probs should decline any ads that require his face, get rid of the made ad contract and then not tell thousands of people the poor soul wet his bed.
Not gonna lie though, if you really are protecting his privacy then probs should decline any ads that require his face, get rid of the made ad contract and then not tell thousands of people the poor soul wet his bed.
Squirrel, what’s the Kristy Hadley debacle? I’ve missed that.
I'd probably do a hash job of explaining so I'll just attach screenshots from Char's account.
Noticed Carrie isn't under Kristy management anymore though?
Attachments
I think it’s fair enough that she now keeps Riv out of her posts. The Made ad was produced before this decision and she cannot control how or where it’s used. Why can’t she change her mind? Lots of people on social media, influencers or otherwise post loads of pictures of their children when they’re young, then have a change of heart as they get a bit older when they realise the repercussions it may have.
Personally, I wouldn’t have put any pictures up of my child from the very beginning, but I completely understand why people do.
All credit to her for changing ways TBH. Just because she started posting pics of him doesn’t mean she needs to continue to do so, or that she’s a hypocrite.
if she continues to use him in paid advertisements in the future though...
Personally, I wouldn’t have put any pictures up of my child from the very beginning, but I completely understand why people do.
All credit to her for changing ways TBH. Just because she started posting pics of him doesn’t mean she needs to continue to do so, or that she’s a hypocrite.
if she continues to use him in paid advertisements in the future though...
- Status