But then she’d have to admit the book/publishing deal was a fad which she isn’t grown enough to do.
Nothing quite says 'I'm not into gardening' like starting in mid November wearing a brand new puffy sleeved shirtWhat’s with the depressing AF music at the beginning of the video??
also she clearly HATES gardening. Like hates it. It could not be more obvious and yet she’s seemingly forcing herself to do it?? And she wonders why people think she’s inauthentic
It wasn't really sneaky She marked it "AD".Another sneaky as in the middle of that video for that seed paper calendar. I think her content is suffering because she has to tailor it to the add instead of just making the content she wanted to. Like she could have made more gardening content before but it feels like she only does it when there's an ad. I guess I don't want to ask her to work for free and maybe that's how she sees non-sponsored content creation but also... It's like literally every video/post.
If she has a 37 minute video, then what are the chances the entire video is considered sponsored? Is there some AD rule about content? (I don't know) If you create a 37 minute video and you talk about a product for less that 30% do you have to declare the video an AD at the outset, or is it fine to just flag the AD portion? I'm guessing there is a rule and, give how long her video is, that she's following it.My understanding of the ASA guidance is that if an entire video is sponsored then it needs to have AD in the title or thumbnail, which this video doesn't. But perhaps I'm mistaken.
View attachment 866402
View attachment 866404
View attachment 866405
It’s nice to give her the benefit of the doubt. But Madeleine has broken ASA guidelines before, so I get others being wary of her approach to declarations!If she has a 37 minute video, then what are the chances the entire video is considered sponsored? Is there some AD rule about content? (I don't know) If you create a 37 minute video and you talk about a product for less that 30% do you have to declare the video an AD at the outset, or is it fine to just flag the AD portion? I'm guessing there is a rule and, give how long her video is, that she's following it.
When they bought the house she went on about how much she loved gardening. Yet she did none over the spring/summer. That’s what is amusing people.I thought it was a solid video for the first 16 minutes. I loved the music and vibe of the beginning. It reminded me of Jane Austen and Fairyland Cottage. I also think the plantable calendar fits perfectly with her brand, so I don't get the criticism there. Also, some of you must be incredible gardeners to find fault with a fairly young person learning how to garden. I think she could have cut it off after around the 16 minute mark though.
Her description states that the video is sponsored. Often influencers will say that a portion of the video is sponsored, or it contains a sponsored segment, but the text says 'this video is kindly sponsored by Primoza' which I understand to mean that the entire video is sponsored. Clearly I'm not an influencer and I'd hope that they have a better grasp of what the rules are, but as others have mentioned there have been previous undisclosed ADs.If she has a 37 minute video, then what are the chances the entire video is considered sponsored? Is there some AD rule about content? (I don't know) If you create a 37 minute video and you talk about a product for less that 30% do you have to declare the video an AD at the outset, or is it fine to just flag the AD portion? I'm guessing there is a rule and, give how long her video is, that she's following it.
No need to guess. The rules are clear and she often does not adhere to them.I'm guessing there is a rule and, give how long her video is, that she's following it.
I really don't think I was being nasty about that? I honestly just feel her content has suffered as a result of all the ads she does and that not all of the ads are properly disclosed as others have said. I thought it had to state ad in the title so perhaps I'm misinformed however I do find it kinda sneaky (whether legitimately allowed or not) when YouTubers put their ads in the middle with no prior warning. Sure the calendar is a better match for her brand but there have been countless other bits of questionable spon-con and I'm just disappointed by it.It wasn't really sneaky She marked it "AD".
I came to this thread as a slightly disillusioned fan, and I know there are some people who want to discuss that, but are there posters who just just like to be nasty?
I thought it was a solid video for the first 16 minutes. I loved the music and vibe of the beginning. It reminded me of Jane Austen and Fairyland Cottage. I also think the plantable calendar fits perfectly with her brand, so I don't get the criticism there. Also, some of you must be incredible gardeners to find fault with a fairly young person learning how to garden. I think she could have cut it off after around the 16 minute mark though.
It wasn't really sneaky She marked it "AD".
I came to this thread as a slightly disillusioned fan, and I know there are some people who want to discuss that, but are there posters who just just like to be nasty?