I do understand a hospital cover up could be a possibility, but I struggle to understand people who are so set on Lucy being innocent (or guilty) and being made the scapegoat when there is virtually no evidence in the public domain. It seems very divided in the Facebook groups, people already firmly made their minds up on both sides. I’m also reserving judgment until the case and open minded it could go either way.
My thoughts are that just because there have been problems at the hospital previously, doesn’t mean this is what happened and that Lucy must be innocent. Both things could exist, a failing hospital and a murderer. I guess someone that way inclined could see a failing hospital as an opportunity to get away with a crime. I’m not saying this is the case with Lucy but just one of the reasons I’m cautious to automatically blame the hospital as there are all sorts of possibilities.
My thoughts are that just because there have been problems at the hospital previously, doesn’t mean this is what happened and that Lucy must be innocent. Both things could exist, a failing hospital and a murderer. I guess someone that way inclined could see a failing hospital as an opportunity to get away with a crime. I’m not saying this is the case with Lucy but just one of the reasons I’m cautious to automatically blame the hospital as there are all sorts of possibilities.