There are no words foe this case at all. Nobody would want to accept that a nurse could do this, or anyone in charge of the care of babies.
BUT... the amount of failings at that hospital. They had people overworking didn't they? And people not clocking their shift right? I really do think she's a scapegoat also. Not a chance would the hospital have let her back on admin duties if she was actually guilty surely?
It's difficult though, because she's never been innocent until proven guilty. She's been guilty from the moment this case was published.
How did her name and identity even get to be made public?
If she's guilty, then she's a disgrace but I really cannot help but think there's something amiss with all this.
Do the CPS need concrete and substantial evidence that she's done this? Or can it jusy be 'she was working at the time?'
The links below say it all. I had a cord prolapse with my eldest. Nobody's fault and he's absolutely fine, no issues whatsoever. But there was a massive investigation, 11 staff members before they could conclude that it was just one of those things that can happen. So how have they, after all these failings, found just one person?
The health watchdog raises serious concerns about care at Countess of Chester Hospital in Cheshire.
www.bbc.co.uk