Lucy Letby Case

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Theyve mentioned insulin. That's how BA killed some of her victims if I'm not mistaken. I've got chills. I can't imagine how the families are feeling.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 16
They must have checked and double checked and cross checked and checked again to come to this conclusion
100%. I said shift patterns and ruling out everyone else would play a major part in this. It has to otherwise the whole case doesn't make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
They must have checked and double checked and cross checked and checked again to come to this conclusion
So I wonder if she was put on admin duty, to 'test out their theory'. I'm guessing the COCH suspected LL almost immediately after that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
So they're letting more information out then. I really hope it's still a fair trial.
A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
There was a case in America, can’t remember what it was for, a serial killer maybe, and the details of the case were so horrific the judge excused the jury from jury duty for the rest of their lives. I can only hope the jurors from this case are afforded the same
I bet these will be too. I do hope so anyways Six months (I bet it goes on even longer) is a huge amount of time to be plucked out of your own life to listen to all this evidence. Once this is over, I bet they have their own adjustments to make.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
Theyve mentioned insulin. That's how BA killed some of her victims if I'm not mistaken. I've got chills. I can't imagine how the families are feeling.
Insulin poisoning is quite significant. Not necessarily on the guilt of LL but certainly that there was more than the failings of the hospital at play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.
I don't think they'd be able to due to the reporting restrictions covering the alleged victims, their families and some of the witnesses. Same as no one without a connection to the case can just stroll in and sit down when someone under 18 is on trial (that's my understanding anyway)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.
I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I was making two points, but not saying tha information would mean no fair trial...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I’m sure this will be addressed later in evidence but would insulin poisoning give quite an instant reaction or a delayed one?
 
Lurked on this forum for the Archie Battersbee case and thought the threads were great for updates and lots of insightful comments.
I’m invested in this trial and looks like we will be here for 6 months or more so thought I better create an account.
Keeping an open mind as to the verdict so far but the start of the prosecution case so far looks concerning!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 16
I agree. No medical or legal background but it is inconceivable to me in this day and age a.) you’d successfully pull off a scandal like this of this scale and seriousness without someone blabbing, and b.) I know the police don’t always get things right but I don’t believe for a second they haven’t got some solid proof
Exactly there has to be some evidence 😢
 
I don't think they'd be able to due to the reporting restrictions covering the alleged victims, their families and some of the witnesses. Same as no one without a connection to the case can just stroll in and sit down when someone under 18 is on trial (that's my understanding)
Ah ok that makes sense too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Well...Nice to meet all you lovely tattlers, I guess we'll be seeing each others names a lot over the next 6 months or so. The part I'm really waiting for before I decide what I think with regards to guilt or innocence is her digital footprint, what she's been looking at online etc, if there's anything been found in her house for example...at the moment I'm not making any assumptions. The parts about her movements outside of work I think I think will be the most telling as to her true character.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 34
So, we've only heard about two babies so far. I would if insulin was involved with all of the deaths and attempts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I was making two points, but not saying tha information would mean no fair trial...
Sorry I misunderstood and thought you were saying it wouldn’t be a fair trial if they are making this info public.
 
I’ll put it out there - I think this is going to be another Harold or Beverly. That’s my gut. A lot of evidence is coming otherwise I doubt the go ahead.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 26
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.