Theyve mentioned insulin. That's how BA killed some of her victims if I'm not mistaken. I've got chills. I can't imagine how the families are feeling.
100%. I said shift patterns and ruling out everyone else would play a major part in this. It has to otherwise the whole case doesn't make sense.They must have checked and double checked and cross checked and checked again to come to this conclusion
So I wonder if she was put on admin duty, to 'test out their theory'. I'm guessing the COCH suspected LL almost immediately after that.They must have checked and double checked and cross checked and checked again to come to this conclusion
A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.So they're letting more information out then. I really hope it's still a fair trial.
I bet these will be too. I do hope so anyways Six months (I bet it goes on even longer) is a huge amount of time to be plucked out of your own life to listen to all this evidence. Once this is over, I bet they have their own adjustments to make.There was a case in America, can’t remember what it was for, a serial killer maybe, and the details of the case were so horrific the judge excused the jury from jury duty for the rest of their lives. I can only hope the jurors from this case are afforded the same
Insulin poisoning is quite significant. Not necessarily on the guilt of LL but certainly that there was more than the failings of the hospital at play.Theyve mentioned insulin. That's how BA killed some of her victims if I'm not mistaken. I've got chills. I can't imagine how the families are feeling.
I don't think they'd be able to due to the reporting restrictions covering the alleged victims, their families and some of the witnesses. Same as no one without a connection to the case can just stroll in and sit down when someone under 18 is on trial (that's my understanding anyway)A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.
I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I was making two points, but not saying tha information would mean no fair trial...A fair trial is open justice. That is what’s happening. It’s typical for this kind of information to be made public once the trial starts. Technically anyone could go sit in the public gallery but I think it would be full with families and reporters.
Yes, although standards have that insulin is administered with a two nurse check.If she was staff nurse would she be allowed to administer insulin?
Yeah I cannot imagine that trialGosh I understand, but it’s a lot for them to carry alone for a long time.
Exactly there has to be some evidenceI agree. No medical or legal background but it is inconceivable to me in this day and age a.) you’d successfully pull off a scandal like this of this scale and seriousness without someone blabbing, and b.) I know the police don’t always get things right but I don’t believe for a second they haven’t got some solid proof
Ah ok that makes sense too.I don't think they'd be able to due to the reporting restrictions covering the alleged victims, their families and some of the witnesses. Same as no one without a connection to the case can just stroll in and sit down when someone under 18 is on trial (that's my understanding)
Sorry I misunderstood and thought you were saying it wouldn’t be a fair trial if they are making this info public.I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I was making two points, but not saying tha information would mean no fair trial...