-
not-a-medical-Dr Jessica Taylor monetising the Russell Brand and David Walliams news is disgusting. She forced her vulnerable employees to sign an NDA to stop them whistle blowing. She threatened survivors of sexual abuse to sue them for “every single one of their assets” if they spoke up. She is one of the most dangerous people in the VAWG sector and does so much harm to women and girls.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Another thing. I don't think it's strange how much she is messaging her colleagues. The conversation is going 2 ways. If she's strange for talking about cases so much so are the other people also engaging in that same conversation.
It’s a gut feeling more than anything. Reading them was unnerving, they just seem totally unnatural- to me at least. Plus asking not to be with child B, pointing out child A was looked after by someone else, questioning why a colleague found it odd etc reads like she was trying to deflect blame/cover her tracks
Of course I still hope she’s not guilty, I’m just finding it harder to believe…
We are amazing. Perfect. Sent directly from God.What's a pisces like ?
Allegedly we are cry babies, sensitive, the most in tune with 'the other side', love music, often have pretty eyes. We can also be spiteful APPARENTLY.
Because she's starting them? Plus it's the whole picture. Her colleagues haven't been accused of mass murder.
If they didn't feel comfortable talking about the cases they could of easily let her know instead of engaging with her.
For me it depends who is leading the conversation. She could be the one that brings up work/the babies and then keeps the conversation going. A lot of them so far seem to indicate that she was the one initiating the texts to colleagues.
It would be a bit bizarre if someone messaged you to tell you a child you cared for had died, to not respond?
Am I the only one who doesn’t find it that suspect. As the colleague was the one who started the conversation about it being odd and Lucy just replied saying they died in different ways and asking her colleague if she agreed?
Even so, I'm not seeing the part where others are pulling away from the convo or outright asking her to stop talking about it. A bit unfair IMO to say it's unusual or whatever else for her to be speaking about her cases to others, when others are engaging back in that conversation.
To be honest doesn't everyone have someone at work who seems obsessed and doesn't have a life outside of their job.
Come on, your being a little bit pedantic here, I think you know the point I'm making.
Thing is though it's everything isn't it. As someone pointed out above, in isolation maybe you could explain things like that. But added on to the whole picture? There's too much.
A serious red flag.
That it isn't it!?? Individually they don't add up to much but altogether?? Way, way, WAY too suspicious.
She comes across as strange to me and very obsessed , hyperfocused on work probably picked up a lot of shifts others couldn't do because of childcare reasons etc. I do sometimes watch work documentaries recently watched that panaroma one and my OH called me a weirdo he was right. I shouldn't be bringing home work with me.
This was definitely my first thoughts, the on purpose part was so big for me but the more I tried to think about it from a 'innocent' point of view- I have definitely said things in a self hating way when I have been really down mentally which she definitely will have been if she truly is innocent. Which is a reasonable explanation to me. Also to clarify for anyone reading I'm firmly on the fence with the case as it's far too early for me, I'm just trying to be the devil's advocate and not believe a young nurse would deliberately harm all those precious babies
Just a selection of her texts but to me she is the one fishing to talk about it.
Her colleagues aren’t exactly engaging in the conversation. They are giving her short, dead end replies.
Her colleagues aren’t exactly engaging in the conversation. They are giving her short, dead end replies.
I don’t find the messages incriminating at all. I think if you think she’s guilty you can look at them and see her trying to deflect/control the narrative. If you think she’s innocent or not sure, they could be viewed as pretty standard messages between colleagues.
The one where the other person asks if it seems weird the babies died in succession, she obviously had a suspicion something was going on… but if she suspected LL would she be saying that to her or would you tell someone else? Probably not possible but it would be useful to see what other nurses were messaging each other at that time to compare.
The one where the other person asks if it seems weird the babies died in succession, she obviously had a suspicion something was going on… but if she suspected LL would she be saying that to her or would you tell someone else? Probably not possible but it would be useful to see what other nurses were messaging each other at that time to compare.
I clearly don't, my response was genuine. I don't think anyone excessively engaged with her. She had the weird reactions IMO. They reacted with shock and sadness, she had unfeeling preoccupation with detail. They seem to be trying to get her to stop talking if anything.
- Status