She's such a gormless looking duck isn't she!? Bet her breath smells, her teeth jist dont look brushed properly
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It's in the latest episode titled Twins I think.
There is a new documentary/news report on 7NEWS spotlight YouTube channel , there is interviews with parents of babies who lucy letby looked after.
People have mentioned that she sounded different to how they thought - can you explain how she sounded? I imagine her to be quite softly and well spoken.
I can’t find the daily Mail podcast at all
It is called the "trial of lucy letby" and is avalible on Spotify, Amazon music, YouTube, apple music.I can’t find the daily Mail podcast at all
There’s a new Dick Gill parody account on Twitter… & Richard Gill actually replying to Girchard Rill 
Attachments
This is so confusingThere’s a new Dick Gill parody account on Twitter… & Richard Gill actually replying to Girchard Rill
I 100% don't understand parody accounts 
I've spent hours listening to YouTube videos and accounts of people who were sat in court. I did wonder how they were able to convict her on just circumstantial evidence, but, the evidence really is damning for anyone in doubt.
She remembers part of the incidents that suit her narrative, but seemingly forget's about the incidents that don't paint her in the best light. Not only the parents, but other nurses have caught her just staring at babies, some of which she had no responsibility over. They all describe this 'blank' look. Everything is far too coincidental, and I doubt the parents would partake in some elaborate coverup Lucy's defence claim is the the case.
The only thing that stands out to me is her motive. She had attention from the Dr she supposedly fancied, he was clearly interested in her. I don't think she'd need to do what she done for that. Although, I do wonder what they would have spoken about had it not been for all those deaths. But to kill babies for the sake having a conversation starter just seems odd.
She remembers part of the incidents that suit her narrative, but seemingly forget's about the incidents that don't paint her in the best light. Not only the parents, but other nurses have caught her just staring at babies, some of which she had no responsibility over. They all describe this 'blank' look. Everything is far too coincidental, and I doubt the parents would partake in some elaborate coverup Lucy's defence claim is the the case.
The only thing that stands out to me is her motive. She had attention from the Dr she supposedly fancied, he was clearly interested in her. I don't think she'd need to do what she done for that. Although, I do wonder what they would have spoken about had it not been for all those deaths. But to kill babies for the sake having a conversation starter just seems odd.
I don’t know much about them either. I just find it funny that they’re making Dick Gill look like an idiotThis is so confusing
That wasn’t her motive though.
The OG members of the thread will be able to give you the specifics but he didn’t come on the scene until she had already harmed, and killed, a number of the babies.
Also, killing babies for any reason is a bit more than ‘odd’ don’t you think…?
Really hope Dr NN is a better Dr than he is a judge of character.
Ah ok yes I already listen to this one but I am a couple behind
Thought it was a different one sorry and thank you
Oh I see, no problemAh ok yes I already listen to this one but I am a couple behind
Thought it was a different one sorry and thank you
if you are looking for the the episode with LL creepy voice it is "another victim" about 11 min 20 secs in...
Eurgh, don'tShe's such a gormless looking duck isn't she!? Bet her breath smells, her teeth jist dont look brushed properly
One of my workmates has Letby teeth (furry and grey) and you can smell her fetid breath 100 yards away.Didn't know whether to laugh or vomit react sorryEurgh, don't
I would argue that the evidence wasn’t “just” circumstantial. There was definitive evidence that babies had been poisoned with insulin, injected with air, and force fed/physically harmed. That was corroborated by experts and the defence couldn’t argue against most of that.
So we know that there was a baby harmer/murderer on that ward.
Coupled with LL present for all incidents, having numerous documents relating to the children and others in her home, and concerns raised about her presence and behaviour by other Drs, it’s pretty evident she was the only medical professional with access and means to have done it. Yes she wasn’t caught in the act (although possible nearly!) but the evidence given we know babies were murdered was pretty strong.
So we know that there was a baby harmer/murderer on that ward.
Coupled with LL present for all incidents, having numerous documents relating to the children and others in her home, and concerns raised about her presence and behaviour by other Drs, it’s pretty evident she was the only medical professional with access and means to have done it. Yes she wasn’t caught in the act (although possible nearly!) but the evidence given we know babies were murdered was pretty strong.
Phew! I’m so fed up of hearing how it was only circumstantial evidence. The babies were killed in a hospital setting which is the only thing confusing matters- otherwise you have murder victims filled with air. It’s like saying stab wounds are circumstantial evidence imo. There’s no explanation for that air, other than that it was put there. And it was put there by someone with extensive knowledge and understanding that it would kill them. And absolute concrete evidence of poisoning.
Even the judge said it wasn’t wholly circumstantial. (His words were ‘substantially, but not wholly’). I think he knows best.
- Status