I think that pretty much shows how guilty she is. Nobody (not including dick head Gill et al here) wanted to testify on her behalf. The only expert they could find was the plumber, poor guy. Her colleague went to court every day, she didn't testify. The defense had nobody to call because every expert could see that she did it.Gaaaawd, Please don't all jump at meI wasn't for one second suggesting her defence should have set her free or imply that she was at no fault, but they could've got a lot more experts to testify for her - for example around her mental state around the time. Many people claim "insanity" or stress or anything else to justify their actions. I also always see many times, odd weird doctors to testify for baseless cases. I am surprised they couldn't even get one single nurse or doctor, even a non-respectable one.
And given all the support she had, more "friends" to testify what a "great person" she is to support her character.
I am not saying this would have helped her, just that it would have been a more balanced defence.
---
They proved it wasn't hyperinsulinism anyway and that it was man-made insulin that was used.
She couldn't claim insanity/stress etc. because she was evaluated and all they could come up with was ptsd from being arrested in her
The new DM podcast with Dr McRae is interesting. Kind of wish she didn't mention the whole microchip trial because we all know where the freaks minds are going to wander now.