Lucy Letby Case #66 Guilty

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I’m
Agreed. Not sure what I’d do exactly but I’d probably be quite shocked and quiet and just cooperate in any way I could
 
Reactions: 5
Me too! Although the only texts that were revealed in court were the ones pertinent to the case - i.e. the messages sent when she was on the shifts linked to each of the babies. I think there are only 3 main people who know the full extent of the affair - LL, NN and the data analyst on the Cheshire Police documentary, who will know EVERYTHING about their affair as no doubt there were thousands of messages between the two that she had to read through.
 
Reactions: 14
Maybe...
Or they are trying to stop wild rumours, or some blabbermouth revealing the details of the parents or children.
The press will already know
Maybe...
Or they are trying to stop wild rumours, or some blabbermouth revealing the details of the parents or children.
the press wouldn’t publish those names as there are court orders preventing it, it’s definitely to shut down anything but the official line
 
Reactions: 1
Interesting phrasing about parents that has been informed that “the birth of their child” is part of the ongoing inquiry. They were informed earlier this year apparently. Would have thought it would be “their time on the unit” etc if like the other cases.
I know she attended births too.
 
Reactions: 19
What was her role at Liverpool womans, could it relate to the deaths there, so not on the unit at Chester?
 
Reactions: 4
Also very interesting that she wrote the
“No one will ever know what happened or why” note AFTER the first arrest and the 6 further handover notes that were found at her parents’ house after the first arrest also. So no handovers at their house in the first arrest, but 6 all that time later at the second arrest. Where had she stashed them after the first arrest? She absolutely wanted these things found. These must be in the ones marked keep. They are indisputably trophies. I wonder if they pressed her either in police interview or in court on how exactly those handovers had got there after the first house searches.
 
Reactions: 28
One thing I’ve always wondered about in awful heinous cases like this is their lawyer. How do you defend this? I understand everyone is entitled to defence and a fair trial but how do you sleep at night knowing the next day you’re going to court to try and get this person off? Truly boggles my mind
 
Reactions: 2
They are used to it and trained as such to put personal thoughts or feelings aside to ensure that the law is upheld. I don’t think it’s the kind of job just anyone could do.
 
Reactions: 20
My understanding is that BM is in a pool of defence so he essential didn’t choose to defend her but as part of his job he had too.
He did a really good job and I am thankful for that as she can’t claim she got an unfair trial.
We need good defence lawyers to ensure that British justice is fair and someone needs to do that job, it doesnt mean he thinks she’s not guilty
---
If she’s charged again will she have the same prosecution and defence lawyers or will it be a new team completely ?
 
Reactions: 18
Do you think anybody here, that’s followed the case every day for almost a year.. actually believes that she’s guilty because of her footwear?
Sorry I thought that was the smoking gun in her case? Are you trying to tell me now it’s A FUCKING JOKE? I am SHOCKED
 
Reactions: 19
Did she pay for her defence team? Presumably so? Just sitting here thinking if I were accused of a crime tomorrow I wouldn’t have the money to pay for a shithot KC like BM! (Obviously I haven’t committed a crime, just feel the need to clarify that)
 
Reactions: 4
A black bin bag appeared in her garage between the 1st and 2nd arrest and that’s where the “nobody knows what happened and why” note was then discovered. She was not supposed to return to her own house between the arrests.
At the same time and date her parents place is searched and the further 6 handovers are found. Raises serious questions about where she got those handovers from and an insight into her psyche that even after what she’s accused of and been found to have all those medical records collated under her bed, she still couldn’t be without more handovers and marked them “keep”. Totally mind boggling. She should have to answer how she got them and how she got them to her parents home.
 
Reactions: 30
NN? Surely Dr A also knows?!
 
Reactions: 5
Okay that’s vastly different to responding to someone taking pictures of her. The more I hear about this woman the more she reminds me of the mother of someone I once knew. The someone I once knew was devoid of empathy and I always thought her mother was to blame for a lot of her shitty behaviour.
 
Reactions: 18
He defended her well. If she'd not had a good defence, she could claim an unfair trial and have a retrial so he would have been able to sleep at night knowing he was allowing justice to be served.
I agree though. It takes a certain type of person, I'd have not been able to hold it together!
 
Reactions: 12
Sorry I thought that was the smoking gun in her case? Are you trying to tell me now it’s A FUCKING JOKE? I am SHOCKED
I'm devastated to think it may have been a joke..I dread to think what I'm going to hear next ten bloody months, or more and I'm just finding this out
 
Reactions: 7
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.