You don’t think people who’ve been found guilty of a crime should have to be there to face the consequences of their actions and their victims?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Ah… I’m really only thinking out loud. It certainly doesn’t make you a murdering bleep. A lot of times in young women with MS, optic neuritis can be the first presenting symptom. After that, it can be a sign of potentially some brain inflammation, infection (herpes/CMV). Often though it’s transient and goes away with steroids.
She would have been evaluated with brain scans when she was diagnosed with ON to see if it was a symptom of a larger diagnosis, so I think we would have heard of it was anything more.
Also, as part of a psych evaluation to stand trial she would almost certainly have undergone this kind of testing to outrule brain lesions or any organic cause. Usually once physical testing comes back negative then it’s a clear psychiatric diagnosis of sociopath/psychopath or whatever she is.
I suppose I was just thinking out loud. I probably shouldn’t. Id still like to see her scans though.
Incubabies is one I know parents have raised money for http://incubabies.org.uk/
not nonsense at all. They are happy enough to commit such heinous crimes and should have to sit and face the full consequences
Definitely deserves the WLO in my opinion. Her victims were the most vulnerable you could imagine and she was in a position of complete trust. She even did that extra training to get put with the sickest babies. It was devious and premeditated. And all that balls with the memory boxes further invading the babies privacy in my opinion. Exploiting the grieving parents. Absolutely sick. I hope she rots.
Yep exactly - just heard that.
Post it note stockist
yes I agree. I can’t celebrate as there’s no bringing those babies back or heartache for the parents. Closure is the only positive
Last edited:
Does a 10-1 majority mean a juror was in the not guilty camp? Surely not even though I know everyone is entitled to their opinion it's still a wtf moment
Sorry for my ignorance but do the senior managers in the NHS have to have a medical background or not a requirement?
There will be so much more that comes out, and probably lots more charges. We’re not going anywhere!
Last edited:
Yep! So the families can't address their victim impact statements to her. Coward.
I forgot to have lunch and my phone battery got down to 5% so I had to eventually move!
TV off now though and just reading on here.
Feel oddly disjointed from this now it's everywhere.
Having had a critically ill baby in NICU this is absolutely heartbreaking. I hope every day and night is unbearable where she's off to now and she gets what is coming to her.
Fingers crossed for a re trial for the cases that couldn't reach a verdict today.
Fingers crossed for a re trial for the cases that couldn't reach a verdict today.
"There is 4 or 5 babies who could be going to school right now but they aren't "
It broke my heart
I find it a bit odd that they agreed unanimous on some verdicts but majority on others. That is assuming it is the same juror each time.
I think some come in straight from the business sector, which probably explains why the NHS is in such chaos.
i just struggle to grasp how if you think she’s guilty on some you seriously think she didn’t do the rest
Why can’t they force her by video link at least? Should drag her there kicking and screaming
- Status