which I completely agree with but it is rather irritating being told not to jump to guilty (after engaging in many innocent theories) by someone who is repeatedly jumping to innocent.
which I completely agree with but it is rather irritating being told not to jump to guilty (after engaging in many innocent theories) by someone who is repeatedly jumping to innocent.I agree. There’s not many places you can talk freely and open about it as it’s such a sensitive topic too, I quite like reading all the opinions on it - even ones opposite to mine, it’s good to be open minded about it and see things from other points of view.
I agree. And I also agree with your verdict I think she’s 100% guilty and I’ve said that so many times. I’ve also said I’d be shite on the jury because I was convinced she was guilty on the first daywhich I completely agree with but it is rather irritating being told not to jump to guilty (after engaging in many innocent theories) by someone who is repeatedly jumping to innocent.
Do you want an actual ‘smoking gun’ still clutched in her clawed hand while cackling ‘I did it pahaha’?We haven’t heard the full evidence of how the insulin poisoning was supposedly done. Is there physical evidence of it being mixed with the other nutrients?
I haven’t done that?!which I completely agree with but it is rather irritating being told not to jump to guilty (after engaging in many innocent theories) by someone who is repeatedly jumping to innocent.
I take note of your posts quite a bit tbh and find it interesting reading peoples opinions why they feel certain waysI've been loud and clear what I think but I am prepared to see the trial out and am prepared to change my mind if the evidence sways me.
I agree. As much as I’ve got a different opinion a lot of Lucy’s posts have made me think quite a lot and a lot of information I didn’t know before. Very helpfulI take note of your posts quite a bit tbh and find it interesting reading peoples opinions why they feel certain ways
No not you but pretty obvious your comment was aimed at me. It was not petty bitching I asked how she was at that conclusion as I think it is pretty important to listen to others reasoning but all I get back is about how I have a personal issue after telling me I jumped to guiltyI haven’t done that?!
Maybe worth ignoring those users you mean though as it’s difficult for others to read and follow the thread if there’s petty bitching going on.
I assume she questioned if it was the fluids as the rash appeared 5 minutes(?) after the bag was changed. Maybe she said they should be checked but then later thought she was wrong and it couldn’t have been?Her responses are really odd imo.
The comment about the bag of fluid being 'not what we thought it was' - why would she come to that conclusion? Why suspect the fluids of causing the rash rather than some other medical problem? A medical explanation would be more likely than a contaminated bag, surely?
She claims to have asked to check the bags, but there's no record of her making that request and none of the staff remember her asking questions about it. If she believed the bag's contents were making a baby seriously ill, this would be a matter of urgency, not something you'd forget about when your shift ends.
Oh wow. Didn't think anyone was paying me any mind lol. Thanks I feel kinda flatteredI take note of your posts quite a bit tbh and find it interesting reading peoples opinions why they feel certain ways
I sorta think maybe the thread should be locked.This trial is 6 months long and the thread will be locked within the first 2 weeks if people don’t stop arguing and sniping at each other. Which would be a shame because it’s really useful reading everyone’s opinion (professional and personal) and things being pointed out you may not have noticed yourself.
Ey?!?! My comment was not aimed at you. My comment was about the threadNo not you but pretty obvious your comment was aimed at me. It was not petty bitching I asked how she was at that conclusion as I think it is pretty important to listen to others reasoning but all I get back is about how I have a personal issue after telling me I jumped to guilty
I agree. There’s not many places you can talk freely and open about it as it’s such a sensitive topic too, I quite like reading all the opinions on it - even ones opposite to mine, it’s good to be open minded about it and see things from other points of view.
Why do you think people view it as entertainment? People on here have shared personal stories people are supporting others. I cannot fathom that.I sorta think maybe the thread should be locked.
It's feels quite disrespectful to the babies and families at times. This is a live murder trial of 7 precious babies but I feel some people view it as entertainment.
Bit much, I don't think anyone views it as entertainmentI sorta think maybe the thread should be locked.
It's feels quite disrespectful to the babies and families at times. This is a live murder trial of 7 precious babies but I feel some people view it as entertainment.
Top left on the thread, just under the thread title, is a pink button labelled "wiki". Certain members have put together all the information here and it is all very well broken down. You should be able to find the info you are looking for there.Can anyone save me a harrowing search?
I'm curious what the initial cause of death was for baby A. I think I'm getting confused. As i undetstand it if the air embolism was suspected on the first baby the whole friggin place should have gone in to immediate urgent or emergency response
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?