Futtrit
VIP Member
1:56pm
Mr Myers says none of the other staff, including Dr Ukoh, give a discolouration description for Child M.
He says Child M did make a good recovery, gradually, from the collapse.
He says the significant issue is Letby's last contact with Child M is when she is involved with administering antibiotics at 3.45pm, and if air has been administered at that time, he says it would not take 15-16 minutes to have effect.
He says air embolus is fast acting.
He says the amount of air alleged to be administered in this case is 0.5ml.
He says if there was an intention to kill, it would have been larger.
He asks how someone would measure 0.5ml or calculate it.
He says even a minute quantity would have a quick impact.
He says fortunately, neither twin of Child L or Child M appeared to have suffered harm as a consequence.
He says the theory of air embolus is "utterly unrealistic" for Child M.
---
1:57pm
Mr Myers refers to the case of Child N, for which there are three counts alleged against Lucy Letby. He outlines the events for Child N, who had haemophilia.
---
2:01pm
Mr Myers says Professor Sally Kinsey said Child N was more likely to suffer a bleed from trauma than babies who do not have haemophilia, and the amount of blood would be larger.
Prof Kinsey had said the process of instrumentation had the potential to cause bleeding, such as a naso-gastric tube.
Mr Myers says the Countess of Chester Hospital did not have Factor 8 for Child N at birth.
He says for the first Child N event, for which it is alleged there was trauma and/or an air embolus, he asks if Letby was even there.
Mr Myers says none of the other staff, including Dr Ukoh, give a discolouration description for Child M.
He says Child M did make a good recovery, gradually, from the collapse.
He says the significant issue is Letby's last contact with Child M is when she is involved with administering antibiotics at 3.45pm, and if air has been administered at that time, he says it would not take 15-16 minutes to have effect.
He says air embolus is fast acting.
He says the amount of air alleged to be administered in this case is 0.5ml.
He says if there was an intention to kill, it would have been larger.
He asks how someone would measure 0.5ml or calculate it.
He says even a minute quantity would have a quick impact.
He says fortunately, neither twin of Child L or Child M appeared to have suffered harm as a consequence.
He says the theory of air embolus is "utterly unrealistic" for Child M.
---
1:57pm
Mr Myers refers to the case of Child N, for which there are three counts alleged against Lucy Letby. He outlines the events for Child N, who had haemophilia.
---
2:01pm
Mr Myers says Professor Sally Kinsey said Child N was more likely to suffer a bleed from trauma than babies who do not have haemophilia, and the amount of blood would be larger.
Prof Kinsey had said the process of instrumentation had the potential to cause bleeding, such as a naso-gastric tube.
Mr Myers says the Countess of Chester Hospital did not have Factor 8 for Child N at birth.
He says for the first Child N event, for which it is alleged there was trauma and/or an air embolus, he asks if Letby was even there.