Oh dearest Della, I had no idea these things are allowed to happen. I hope I don’t put my foot in it but I couldn’t read what you wrote and not say anything. So much is unknown about how your baby will be and grow once they are here when you find out they have challenges ahead. My girl had congenital heart defects (and quoted high chance of DS which she does not have), it hurts my heart to think she could be viewed as less than others, or a suffering to be ended. I can’t even imagine how it must make you feel knowing this is allowed. Fuck the Netherlands.I've started writing this many times and deleted it. I'm not going to lie you've really got my back up but I know that's because I have an emotional connection to the subject matter and you very clearly have not.
I could've aborted my baby the day before he was born in this country. Legally.
If he was born in the Netherlands I could have murdered him the day after he was born. Legally.
The strict guidance you speak of, the criteria for murder (if a child is already born its not fucking euthanasia or palliative, it's murder) would've been met by my son and MANY of his friends within our community.
When he was born Louie had congenital heart defects, kidney problems and various other issues. He would have met the 'very strict criteria' but instead of murdering him I decided to just love him.
judge will take a number of days because he basically repeats all the evidence for both sides again4:28pm
That concludes the prosecution's closing speech.
I presume this will also be it for the day, (Mark's probably on a tram as we speak!) and defence starts (and possibly ends, based on their evidence) tomorrow.
Do we think Judge's summing up will take all next week, or are there some planned breaks do we know? If not, we could be in deliberation territory by this time next week, what a thought...
First guilty vote for me too. Been lurking and reading all the threads but haven’t commented until now41 threads in and my first full guilty vote. It's been a while lads but I got there!
Sorry, I'm definitely being dense but just wanted to check I'm understanding the naming but not naming them thingI bet this bit is really heavy in court with him using their names.
Edit - bloody copy & paste messed up!
Mr Johnson lists the common events for the babies in this indictment by categorisation.
By ones who collapsed despite having good air entry but saturations were dropping: Child A, C, D, G, H [second event], I [third event and fourth event], M, O [twice], P.
It made me angry too, my child is one of those children who could have been euthanized until the day I gave birth, the "without reasonable future" bit really got to me. My child has an amazing life and the world is a better place for having her. What an absolute arsehole he is.Was debating it yesterday and if he had calmed down I wouldn't have. The bit about euthanasia though made me so angry. He's deranged.
My 6 year old thinks you only grow on birthdays, so each year on his birthday, he comes running to ask if he looks taller and see if his legs have got longer. Bloody love it for himHere is a funny little story to make you smile. I can’t whistle for shit but always wanted to be able to do the whistle bit in always look on the bright side of life.
When I was 6 I got it into my head and that I turned 7 I would be able to whistle and when I went to bed on the eve of my 7th birthday I was so excited - I woke up in the middle of the night and saw it was past midnight so it was my birthday and I tired to whistle and I couldn’t - was absolutely devastated![]()
laughed so hard at this. Much needed it today - thanks @slingo16don’t blame me. I still reckon it’s old blondie trolling everyone
Wow. This is just… wow. To anyone there today I send so much love because this must have been so hard to hear. But on the contrary having those names read out each time feels like the beginning of justice in some way. They are acknowledged as defenceless innocent babies, as living people who deserved better. My heart feels so heavy tonight.I bet this bit is really heavy in court with him using their names.
Edit - bloody copy & paste messed up!
Mr Johnson lists the common events for the babies in this indictment by categorisation.
By ones who collapsed despite having good air entry but saturations were dropping: Child A, C, D, G, H [second event], I [third event and fourth event], M, O [twice], P.
By bleeds and/or bleeding in throat: Child C, E, G, H, N, plus 'false note by Letby' in K.
Unusual discolouration: Child A, B, D, E, I, M, O, H.
Suffered life-threatening collapses out of nowhere then recovered very quickly: Child B, D, H [both collapses], I [events one to three], M, N, O, P.
Children who collapsed when designated nurse left or leaving the room: Child C, D, G [first event], I [second event and fourth event], K, N [first event], P [third collapse - when doctors were out of the room], Q [slight variation - when Letby got herself out of the room].
Premature babies screaming/crying at time of collapse: Child E, I, N.
Children who collapsed shortly after being visited by their parents: Child B, H, I [first event], M, N, O, P.
Children who recovered quickly when taken to other hospitals: Child H, I [after 3rd collapse], N, Q.
Mr Johnson says Child K's tube never moved after being transferred out of the Countess.
When Letby participated in inappropriate post-death behaviours: Child C, I, O.
Poinsoned by insulin: F, L.
Mr Johnson says if Letby had not sabotaged seven babies, they would all have gone home. The other 10 babies, Letby attempted to murder.