AllieBee
VIP Member
He has such a weird logic.
- Notice
Deeznutslol
VIP Member
what happens if the jury agree on some of the charges but cannot agree on others? Is the whole trial then completely fucked? Ie if they agree on like 20 of the charges and then are hung on the remaining 2?
@Tofino @Mellowyellow thank you both!
Futtrit
VIP Member
12:19pm
Mr Myers moves to the issue of 'delay'.
He says there is an issue with missing door swipe data between July-October 2015, and allegations are made against Letby during that time, such as during the case of Child I.
He says the prosecution had accused Letby of 'making up a note' for September 30, 2015.
Mr Myers says the prosecution can make that allegation as the door swipe data is missing for that date.
Another note is referred to for October 14, 2015.
He says Dr Matthew Neame's note, timed at 5.55am, is used as evidence there was a delay in reporting the issues.
Mr Myers says it is their case 5.55am was when the note was written, not the time he attended.
He says there is no door swipe data for that day to say when that doctor arrived.
Mr Myers moves to the issue of 'delay'.
He says there is an issue with missing door swipe data between July-October 2015, and allegations are made against Letby during that time, such as during the case of Child I.
He says the prosecution had accused Letby of 'making up a note' for September 30, 2015.
Mr Myers says the prosecution can make that allegation as the door swipe data is missing for that date.
Another note is referred to for October 14, 2015.
He says Dr Matthew Neame's note, timed at 5.55am, is used as evidence there was a delay in reporting the issues.
Mr Myers says it is their case 5.55am was when the note was written, not the time he attended.
He says there is no door swipe data for that day to say when that doctor arrived.
Thanks for the clarification!
mrs.darcy
VIP Member
It's a conversation.
Futtrit
VIP Member
12:33pm
Mr Myers refers to the case of Child C.
He says Dr Evans identified no cause for the collapse in his report, but identified air embolus in evidence.
He says a number of things are "wrong and unfair" about this case from Letby's perspective.
He says if Child C was 1g lighter, he would have been treated at a different hospital.
He was very premature, poorly and had pneumonia when he died, and had black bile aspirates in the final 24 hours of life.
He says the medical experts refused to acknowledge Child C was more poorly than they said he was.
He says Letby is being blamed for something when 'on the evidence she wasn't even in the room when alleged harm was done.'
Mr Myers refers to the case of Child C.
He says Dr Evans identified no cause for the collapse in his report, but identified air embolus in evidence.
He says a number of things are "wrong and unfair" about this case from Letby's perspective.
He says if Child C was 1g lighter, he would have been treated at a different hospital.
He was very premature, poorly and had pneumonia when he died, and had black bile aspirates in the final 24 hours of life.
He says the medical experts refused to acknowledge Child C was more poorly than they said he was.
He says Letby is being blamed for something when 'on the evidence she wasn't even in the room when alleged harm was done.'
ricemittens
Well-known member
I keep dipping in and out of these threads. I tried listening to the podcast to get up to date but it wasn’t for me, any other podcasts out there or a condensed version I can read? When do jury get sent out?
What's a convo, sorry if I'm a bit thick.